TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast cancer-related lymphedema rates after modern axillary treatments
T2 - How accurate are our estimates?
AU - Cortina, Chandler S.
AU - Yen, Tina W.F.
AU - Bergom, Carmen
AU - Fields, British
AU - Craft, Morgan A.
AU - Currey, Adam
AU - Kong, Amanda L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated methods to minimize the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema while preserving regional control. We sought to determine the percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema that surgeons and radiation oncologists discuss with patients before axillary interventions. Methods: A nationwide survey of surgeons and radiation oncologists was performed from July to August 2020. Participants were asked to identify what number they discuss with patients when estimating the percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema after different axillary interventions. Results: Six hundred and eighty surgeons and 324 radiation oncologists responded (14% response rate). While the estimated rate after sentinel lymph node biopsy was clinically similar between surgeons and radiation oncologists, statistically surgeons quoted a higher percent lifetime-risk (5.7% vs 5.0%, P = .03). Surgeons estimated significantly higher rates of breast cancer-related lymphedema compared with radiation oncologists (P < .001) for axillary lymph node dissection (21.8% vs 17.5%), sentinel lymph node biopsy with regional nodal irradiation (14.1% vs 11.2%), and axillary lymph node dissection with regional nodal irradiation (34.8% vs 26.2%). Conclusion: There is variability in the estimated rates of breast cancer-related lymphedema providers discuss with patients. These findings highlight the need for physician education on the current evidence of percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema to provide patients with accurate estimates before axillary interventions.
AB - Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated methods to minimize the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema while preserving regional control. We sought to determine the percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema that surgeons and radiation oncologists discuss with patients before axillary interventions. Methods: A nationwide survey of surgeons and radiation oncologists was performed from July to August 2020. Participants were asked to identify what number they discuss with patients when estimating the percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema after different axillary interventions. Results: Six hundred and eighty surgeons and 324 radiation oncologists responded (14% response rate). While the estimated rate after sentinel lymph node biopsy was clinically similar between surgeons and radiation oncologists, statistically surgeons quoted a higher percent lifetime-risk (5.7% vs 5.0%, P = .03). Surgeons estimated significantly higher rates of breast cancer-related lymphedema compared with radiation oncologists (P < .001) for axillary lymph node dissection (21.8% vs 17.5%), sentinel lymph node biopsy with regional nodal irradiation (14.1% vs 11.2%), and axillary lymph node dissection with regional nodal irradiation (34.8% vs 26.2%). Conclusion: There is variability in the estimated rates of breast cancer-related lymphedema providers discuss with patients. These findings highlight the need for physician education on the current evidence of percent lifetime-risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema to provide patients with accurate estimates before axillary interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118558521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.019
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 34736790
AN - SCOPUS:85118558521
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 171
SP - 682
EP - 686
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 3
ER -