Abstract
We study the optimal incentive scheme for a multistage project in which the agent privately observes intermediate progress. The optimal contract involves a soft deadline wherein the principal guarantees funding up to a certain date-if the agent reports progress at that date, then the principal gives him a relatively short hard deadline to complete the project-if progress is not reported at that date, then a probationary phase begins in which the project is randomly terminated at a constant rate until progress is reported. We explore several variants of the model with implications for optimal project design. In particular, we show that the principal benefits by imposing a small cost on the agent for submitting a progress report or by making the first stage of the project somewhat "harder" than the second.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3660-3699 |
| Number of pages | 40 |
| Journal | American Economic Review |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Breakthroughs, deadlines, and self-reported progress: Contracting for multistage projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver