TY - JOUR
T1 - Brain functional connectivity, but not neuroanatomy, captures the interrelationship between sex and gender in preadolescents
AU - Metoki, Athanasia
AU - Chauvin, Roselyne J.
AU - Gordon, Evan M.
AU - Laumann, Timothy O.
AU - Kay, Benjamin P.
AU - Adeyemo, Babatunde
AU - Krimmel, Samuel R.
AU - Marek, Scott
AU - Wang, Anxu
AU - Van, Andrew N.
AU - Baden, Noah J.
AU - Suljic, Vahdeta
AU - Scheidter, Kristen M.
AU - Monk, Julia
AU - Whiting, Forrest I.
AU - Ramirez-Perez, Nadeshka J.
AU - Barch, Deanna M.
AU - Sotiras, Aristeidis
AU - Dosenbach, Nico U.F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Understanding sex differences in the adolescent brain is crucial, as they relate to sex-specific neurological and psychiatric conditions. Predicting sex from adolescent brain data may reveal how these differences influence neurodevelopment. Recently, attention has shifted toward socially-identified gender (distinct from sex assigned at birth) recognizing its explanatory power. This study evaluates whether resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), cortical thickness, or cortical volume better predicts sex and sex/gender alignment (congruence between sex and gender) in preadolescents. Using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study data and machine learning, rsFC predicted sex more accurately (85 %) than cortical thickness (76 %) and cortical volume (70 %). Brain regions most predictive of sex belonged to association (default mode, dorsal attention, parietal memory) and visual networks. The rsFC classifier trained on sex/gender aligned youth classified more accurately unseen youth with sex/gender alignment (n = 2013) than unalignment (n = 1116). The female rsFC sex profile was positively associated with sex/gender alignment, while in males, there was a negative association. However, neither brain modality predicted sex/gender alignment. These findings suggest that while rsFC predicts sex in the adolescent brain more accurately, it does not directly capture sex/gender alignment, underscoring the need for further investigation into the neural underpinnings of gender.
AB - Understanding sex differences in the adolescent brain is crucial, as they relate to sex-specific neurological and psychiatric conditions. Predicting sex from adolescent brain data may reveal how these differences influence neurodevelopment. Recently, attention has shifted toward socially-identified gender (distinct from sex assigned at birth) recognizing its explanatory power. This study evaluates whether resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), cortical thickness, or cortical volume better predicts sex and sex/gender alignment (congruence between sex and gender) in preadolescents. Using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study data and machine learning, rsFC predicted sex more accurately (85 %) than cortical thickness (76 %) and cortical volume (70 %). Brain regions most predictive of sex belonged to association (default mode, dorsal attention, parietal memory) and visual networks. The rsFC classifier trained on sex/gender aligned youth classified more accurately unseen youth with sex/gender alignment (n = 2013) than unalignment (n = 1116). The female rsFC sex profile was positively associated with sex/gender alignment, while in males, there was a negative association. However, neither brain modality predicted sex/gender alignment. These findings suggest that while rsFC predicts sex in the adolescent brain more accurately, it does not directly capture sex/gender alignment, underscoring the need for further investigation into the neural underpinnings of gender.
KW - Adolescence
KW - Adolescent brain cognitive development study
KW - Brain networks
KW - Cortical thickness
KW - Gender
KW - Resting-state functional connectivity
KW - Sex
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019181561
U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101624
DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101624
M3 - Article
C2 - 41061484
AN - SCOPUS:105019181561
SN - 1878-9293
VL - 76
JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
M1 - 101624
ER -