TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone mineral density response to caloric restriction-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Villareal, Dennis T.
AU - Fontana, Luigi
AU - Weiss, Edward P.
AU - Racette, Susan B.
AU - Steger-May, Karen
AU - Schechtman, Kenneth B.
AU - Klein, Samuel
AU - Holloszy, John O.
PY - 2006/12/11
Y1 - 2006/12/11
N2 - Background: Bone loss often accompanies weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR), but whether bone loss accompanies similar weight loss induced by exercise (EX) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that EX-induced weight loss is associated with less bone loss compared with CR-induced weight loss. Methods: Forty-eight adults (30 women; 18 men; mean±SD age, 57±3 years; and mean±SD body mass index, 27±2 kg/m2) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 1 year: CR group (n=19), regular EX group (n=19), or a healthy lifestyle (HL) control group (n=10). Primary outcome measure was change in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary outcomes were bone markers and hormones. Results: Body weight decreased similarly in the CR and EX groups (10.7%±6.3% [-8.2±4.8 kg] vs 8.4%±6.3% [-6.7±5.6 kg]; P=.21), whereas weight did not change in the HL group (-1.2%±2.5% [-0.9±2.0 kg]). Compared with the HL group, the CR group had decreases in BMD at the total hip (-2.2%±3.1% vs 1.2%±2.1%; P=.02) and intertrochanter (-2.1%±3.4% vs 1.7±2.8%; P=.03). The CR group had a decrease in spine BMD (-2.2%±3.3%; P=.009). Despite weight loss, the EX group did not demonstrate a decrease in BMD at any site. Body weight changes correlated with BMD changes in the CR (R=0.61; P=.007) but not in the EX group. Bone turnover increased in both CR and EX groups. Conclusions: CR-induced weight loss, but not EX-induced weight loss, is associated with reductions in BMD at clinically important sites of fracture. These data suggest that EX should be an important component of a weight loss program to offset adverse effects of CR on bone.
AB - Background: Bone loss often accompanies weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR), but whether bone loss accompanies similar weight loss induced by exercise (EX) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that EX-induced weight loss is associated with less bone loss compared with CR-induced weight loss. Methods: Forty-eight adults (30 women; 18 men; mean±SD age, 57±3 years; and mean±SD body mass index, 27±2 kg/m2) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 1 year: CR group (n=19), regular EX group (n=19), or a healthy lifestyle (HL) control group (n=10). Primary outcome measure was change in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary outcomes were bone markers and hormones. Results: Body weight decreased similarly in the CR and EX groups (10.7%±6.3% [-8.2±4.8 kg] vs 8.4%±6.3% [-6.7±5.6 kg]; P=.21), whereas weight did not change in the HL group (-1.2%±2.5% [-0.9±2.0 kg]). Compared with the HL group, the CR group had decreases in BMD at the total hip (-2.2%±3.1% vs 1.2%±2.1%; P=.02) and intertrochanter (-2.1%±3.4% vs 1.7±2.8%; P=.03). The CR group had a decrease in spine BMD (-2.2%±3.3%; P=.009). Despite weight loss, the EX group did not demonstrate a decrease in BMD at any site. Body weight changes correlated with BMD changes in the CR (R=0.61; P=.007) but not in the EX group. Bone turnover increased in both CR and EX groups. Conclusions: CR-induced weight loss, but not EX-induced weight loss, is associated with reductions in BMD at clinically important sites of fracture. These data suggest that EX should be an important component of a weight loss program to offset adverse effects of CR on bone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845507267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2502
DO - 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2502
M3 - Article
C2 - 17159017
AN - SCOPUS:33845507267
SN - 0003-9926
VL - 166
SP - 2502
EP - 2510
JO - Archives of internal medicine
JF - Archives of internal medicine
IS - 22
ER -