Bisphosphonate therapy in CKD: The current state of affairs

Matthew J. Damasiewicz, Thomas L. Nickolas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of reviewChronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the development of mineral and bone disorders (MBD), including renal osteodystrophy (ROD). ROD is a global disorder of bone strength that is associated with an increased fracture risk. The use of bisphosphonates for fracture risk reduction in CKD remains controversial. This review provides a synopsis of the state-of-the literature regarding the safety and potential antifracture benefits of bisphosphonates in CKD patients.Recent findingsIn preclinical studies of animals with CKD 3-4 and evidence of CKD-MBD, bisphosphonates resulted in changes in bone quality that improve bone strength. Bone turnover was generally reduced to a similar extent in animals with and without CKD. Post hoc analyses of randomized trials in patients with CKD 3-4 reported increases in bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture reduction that were similar in patients with and without CKD. There are no primary clinical trial data in patients with CKD-MBD.SummaryIn patients with CKD without evidence of CKD-MBD, the use of bisphosphonates should follow general population guidelines. The lack of data for patients with CKD 4-5D and evidence of CKD-MBD makes treatment decisions challenging. Clinical studies are urgently needed to provide data on the safety and antifracture benefits of bisphosphonates in these cohorts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-226
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • Bisphosphonates
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Chronic kidney disease- mineral and bone disorders
  • End-stage kidney disease
  • Fractures
  • Osteoporosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bisphosphonate therapy in CKD: The current state of affairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this