Biosocial research in social work journals: A systematic review

  • Brandy R. Maynard
  • , Brian B. Boutwell
  • , Michael G. Vaughn
  • , Sandra Naeger
  • , Nathaniel Dell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Despite an emphasis on a biopsychosocial understanding of human behavior and the relevance of biosocial research to social work practice, it is unclear whether social work is contributing to biosocial research and knowledge. Methods: Systematic review procedures were employed to locate studies that included biological variables (e.g., genetic or physiological factors) related to behavior and were published in a social work journal between 2000 and 2015. Seventy-five social work journals were searched. Studies were screened and coded by two independent reviewers. Results: Eleven studies were eligible for this review; one was a behavior genetics study, two were molecular genetics studies, two were neurological studies, and six studies examined physiological factors such as skin conductance and salivary cortisol. Discussion: Findings suggest that social work as a discipline is not contributing new knowledge to advance the “bio” component of the biopsychosocial framework. Implications and recommendations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-115
Number of pages9
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Keywords

  • Behavior genetics
  • Biosocial research
  • Molecular genetics
  • Social work research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biosocial research in social work journals: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this