TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioequivalence and Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic and Brand Bupropion in Adults With Major Depression
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Kharasch, Evan D.
AU - Neiner, Alicia
AU - Kraus, Kristin
AU - Blood, Jane
AU - Stevens, Angela
AU - Schweiger, Julia
AU - Miller, J. Philip
AU - Lenze, Eric J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2018 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Controversy persists about bupropion XL 300 mg generic equivalence to brand product. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover in 70 adults with major depression in stable remission taking any bupropion XL 300 mg tested bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence of available XL 300 mg products. After a 4-week lead-in on patients' existing bupropion, four 6-week phases evaluated brand and three generics. Patients were uninformed of switching. Drug overencapsulation ensured blinding. There were no differences between any generic and brand, or between generics, in peak plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC 0–24 ) for racemic bupropion or major metabolites. All generics met formal bioequivalence criteria for bupropion and metabolites. There were no differences between generics and brand, or between generics, in depression symptoms or side effects, assessed by every 3-week in-person interview and daily smartphone-based self-report. There were no differences in patients' perceptions of bupropion products. Results show three bupropion XL 300 mg generic products are both bioequivalent and not therapeutically different from brand drug and each other.
AB - Controversy persists about bupropion XL 300 mg generic equivalence to brand product. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover in 70 adults with major depression in stable remission taking any bupropion XL 300 mg tested bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence of available XL 300 mg products. After a 4-week lead-in on patients' existing bupropion, four 6-week phases evaluated brand and three generics. Patients were uninformed of switching. Drug overencapsulation ensured blinding. There were no differences between any generic and brand, or between generics, in peak plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC 0–24 ) for racemic bupropion or major metabolites. All generics met formal bioequivalence criteria for bupropion and metabolites. There were no differences between generics and brand, or between generics, in depression symptoms or side effects, assessed by every 3-week in-person interview and daily smartphone-based self-report. There were no differences in patients' perceptions of bupropion products. Results show three bupropion XL 300 mg generic products are both bioequivalent and not therapeutically different from brand drug and each other.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060187676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cpt.1309
DO - 10.1002/cpt.1309
M3 - Article
C2 - 30460996
AN - SCOPUS:85060187676
SN - 0009-9236
VL - 105
SP - 1164
EP - 1174
JO - Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
JF - Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
IS - 5
ER -