TY - JOUR
T1 - Biocompatibility of a novel microfistula implant in nonprimate mammals for the surgical treatment of glaucoma
AU - Shute, Thomas S.
AU - Dietrich, Ursula M.
AU - Baker, Julia F.M.
AU - Paige Carmichael, K.
AU - Wustenberg, William
AU - Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
AU - Sheybani, Arsham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ocular safety of a novel microfistula implant and its composite materials in an animal model. METHODS. The anterior chambers of 12 rabbit eyes were injected with either glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin extract or balanced salt solution and were followed by serial slit lamp examinations over 3 days. The eyes of 18 canines underwent microfistula implantation or a sham procedure. The animals were monitored over the subsequent 12 months, using serial slit lamp examinations, indirect ophthalmoscopy, tonometry, specular microscopy, and high-resolution ultrasonography. Ocular tissues were examined histopathologically on postoperative days 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365. RESULTS. Glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin did not induce significant intraocular inflammation in the rabbit model. The microfistula implant was well tolerated and did not stimulate significant tissue response in the canine eye. The microfistula tube did not undergo structural change or degradation over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS. In nonprimate mammals, the material composing the microfistula implant and the implant itself do not induce significant inflammation or tissue reaction.
AB - PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ocular safety of a novel microfistula implant and its composite materials in an animal model. METHODS. The anterior chambers of 12 rabbit eyes were injected with either glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin extract or balanced salt solution and were followed by serial slit lamp examinations over 3 days. The eyes of 18 canines underwent microfistula implantation or a sham procedure. The animals were monitored over the subsequent 12 months, using serial slit lamp examinations, indirect ophthalmoscopy, tonometry, specular microscopy, and high-resolution ultrasonography. Ocular tissues were examined histopathologically on postoperative days 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365. RESULTS. Glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin did not induce significant intraocular inflammation in the rabbit model. The microfistula implant was well tolerated and did not stimulate significant tissue response in the canine eye. The microfistula tube did not undergo structural change or degradation over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS. In nonprimate mammals, the material composing the microfistula implant and the implant itself do not induce significant inflammation or tissue reaction.
KW - Biocompatibility
KW - Drainage device
KW - Glaucoma
KW - Microfistula
KW - Microinvasive glaucoma Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978820225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1167/iovs.16-19453
DO - 10.1167/iovs.16-19453
M3 - Article
C2 - 27391549
AN - SCOPUS:84978820225
SN - 0146-0404
VL - 57
SP - 3594
EP - 3600
JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
IS - 8
ER -