Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biochemical and clinical significance of the posttreatment prostate-specific antigen bounce for prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone: A multiinstitutional pooled analysis

  • Eric M. Horwitz
  • , Lawrence B. Levy
  • , Howard D. Thames
  • , Patrick A. Kupelian
  • , Alvaro A. Martinez
  • , Jeffrey M. Michalski
  • , Thomas M. Pisansky
  • , Howard M. Sandler
  • , William U. Shipley
  • , Michael J. Zelefsky
  • , Anthony L. Zietman
  • , Deborah A. Kuban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce phenomenon has been recognized in at least 20% of all patients treated with radiation. The purpose of the current report was to determine if there was a difference in biochemical and clinical control between the bounce and nonbounce (NB) patients using pooled data on 4839 patients with T1-2 prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (RT) alone at 9 institutions between 1986 and 1995. METHODS. The median follow-up was 6.3 years. A posttreatment PSA bounce was defined by a minimal rise of 0.4 ng/mL over a 6-month follow-up period, followed by a drop in PSA level of any magnitude. Endpoints included no biochemical evidence of disease (bNED) failure (BF) (ASTRO definition), distant failure (DF), cause-specific failure (CSF), and overall survival (OS). Patients were stratified by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, age, dose, and risk group. RESULTS. In all, 978 (20%) patients experienced at least 1 posttreatment PSA bounce. Within 3 subgroups (risk group, pretreatment PSA, and age), statistically significant differences of remaining bounce-free were observed on univariate analysis. Patients < 70 years had a 72% chance of remaining bounce-free at 5 years compared with 75% for older patients (P = .04). The NB patients had 72% bNED control at 10 years compared with 58% for the bounce patients. The effect of a bounce remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis (P < .0001). No statistically significant difference in DF, CSF, or OS was observed. CONCLUSIONS. Patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone who experience a posttreatment PSA bounce have increased risk of BF. However, this did not translate into a difference in clinical failure with the available follow-up in the current study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1496-1502
Number of pages7
JournalCancer
Volume107
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006

Keywords

  • Biochemical control
  • PSA bounce
  • Prostate-specific antigen
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Radiation therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biochemical and clinical significance of the posttreatment prostate-specific antigen bounce for prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone: A multiinstitutional pooled analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this