Biceps tenodesis is a viable option for salvage of failed SLAP repair

Brian C. Werner, Hakan C. Pehlivan, Joseph M. Hart, Matthew L. Lyons, C. Jan Gilmore, Cara B. Garrett, Eric W. Carson, David R. Diduch, Mark D. Miller, Stephen F. Brockmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Background: Outcomes of arthroscopic superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) repairs have been well reported with generally favorable outcomes. Unfortunately, a percentage of patients remain dissatisfied or suffer further injury after SLAP repair and may seek additional treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of biceps tenodesis for failed SLAP repairs. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing biceps tenodesis was completed. Inclusion criteria were previous SLAP repair and subsequent revision biceps tenodesis. Exclusion criteria were additional shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, instability procedures, and preoperative frozen shoulder. Objective outcomes were postoperative assessments with Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Physical examination was conducted to determine postoperative range of motion and strength compared with the nonoperative shoulder. Results: A cohort of 24 patients was identified, and of these, 17 patients (71%) completed the study at 2 years' follow-up. The average postoperative Constant score was 84.4; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 75.5; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 73.1%; Simple Shoulder Test score, 9.2; and Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey score, 76.1. Postoperative range of motion of the operative shoulder returned to near that of the asymptomatic nonoperative shoulder. Workers' compensation status led to inferior results. Conclusions: Options for patients with a failed prior SLAP repair are limited. As a salvage operation for failed SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis serves the majority of patients well, with favorable outcomes by validated measures and excellent shoulder range of motion and elbow strength at 2 years' follow-up. Workers' compensation status may predispose patients to poorer outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e179-e184
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2014


  • Biceps tenodesis
  • Failed slap repair
  • Long head biceps
  • SLAP tear
  • Shoulder range of motion
  • Workers' compensation insurance


Dive into the research topics of 'Biceps tenodesis is a viable option for salvage of failed SLAP repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this