Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests

Anna Ryan, Terry Judd, David Swanson, Douglas P. Larsen, Simone Elliott, Katina Tzanetos, Kulamakan Kulasegaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The role of feedback in test-enhanced learning is an understudied area that has the potential to improve student learning. This study investigates the influence of different forms of post-test feedback on retention and transfer of biomedical knowledge within a test-enhanced learning framework. Methods: 64 participants from a Canadian and an Australian medical school sat two single-best-answer formative multiple choice tests one week apart. We compared the effects of conceptually focused, response-oriented, and simple right/wrong feedback on a learner’s ability to correctly answer new (transfer) questions. On the first test occasion, participants received parent items with feedback, and then attempted items closely related (near transfer) to and more distant (far transfer) from parent items. In a repeat test at 1 week, participants were given different near and far transfer versions of parent items. Feedback type, and near and far transfer items were randomized within and across participants. Results: Analysis demonstrated that response-oriented and conceptually focused feedback were superior to traditional right/wrong feedback for both types of transfer tasks and in both immediate and final retention test performance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between response-orientated and conceptually focused groups on near or far transfer problems, nor any differences in performance between our initial test occasion and the retention test 1 week later. As with most studies of transfer, participants’ far transfer scores were lower than for near transfer. Discussion: Right/wrong feedback appears to have limited potential to augment test-enhanced learning. Our work suggests that item-level feedback and feedback that identifies and elaborates on key conceptual knowledge are two important areas for future research on learning, retention and transfer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-313
Number of pages7
JournalPerspectives on Medical Education
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Medical education
  • Multiple choice questions
  • Practice tests
  • Retention
  • Test enhanced learning
  • Transfer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this