Abstract
Philosophers of neuroscience have traditionally described interfield integration using reduction models. Such models describe formal inferential relations between theories at different levels. I argue against reduction and for a mechanistic model of interfield integration. According to the mechanistic model, different fields integrate their research by adding constraints on a multilevel description of a mechanism. Mechanistic integration may occur at a given level or in the effort to build a theory that oscillates among several levels. I develop this alternative model using a putative exemplar of reduction in contemporary neuroscience: the relationship between the psychological phenomena of learning and memory and the electrophysiological phenomenon known as Long-Term Potentiation. A new look at this historical episode reveals the relative virtues of the mechanistic model over reduction as an account of interfield integration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 373-395 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 SPEC. ISS. |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2005 |
Keywords
- Fields
- Long-term potentiation
- Mechanism
- Memory
- Neuroscience
- Reduction
- Unity of science