Beyond reduction: Mechanisms, multifield integration and the unity of neuroscience

  • Carl F. Craver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Scopus citations

Abstract

Philosophers of neuroscience have traditionally described interfield integration using reduction models. Such models describe formal inferential relations between theories at different levels. I argue against reduction and for a mechanistic model of interfield integration. According to the mechanistic model, different fields integrate their research by adding constraints on a multilevel description of a mechanism. Mechanistic integration may occur at a given level or in the effort to build a theory that oscillates among several levels. I develop this alternative model using a putative exemplar of reduction in contemporary neuroscience: the relationship between the psychological phenomena of learning and memory and the electrophysiological phenomenon known as Long-Term Potentiation. A new look at this historical episode reveals the relative virtues of the mechanistic model over reduction as an account of interfield integration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-395
Number of pages23
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume36
Issue number2 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Keywords

  • Fields
  • Long-term potentiation
  • Mechanism
  • Memory
  • Neuroscience
  • Reduction
  • Unity of science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond reduction: Mechanisms, multifield integration and the unity of neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this