TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond Panel-Based Testing
T2 - Exome Analysis Increases Sensitivity for Diagnosis of Genetic Kidney Disease
AU - Wilson, Parker
AU - Love-Gregory, Latisha
AU - Corliss, Meagan
AU - McNulty, Samantha
AU - Heusel, Jonathan
AU - Gaut, Joseph P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a useful tool for evaluating patients with suspected genetic kidney disease. Clinical practice relies on the use of targeted gene panels that are ordered based on patient presentation. We compare the diagnostic yield of clinical panel-based testing to exome analysis. Methods In total, 324 consecutive patients underwent physician-ordered, panel-based NGS testing between December 2014 and October 2018. Gene panels were available for four clinical phenotypes, including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n224), nephrotic syndrome (n56), cystic kidney disease (n26), and Alport syndrome (n13). Variants were analyzed and clinical reports were signed out by a pathologist or clinical geneticist at the time of testing. Subsequently, all patients underwent retrospective exome analysis to detect additional clinically significant variants in kidney disease genes that were not analyzed as part of the initial clinical gene panel. Resulting variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2015 guidelines. Results In the initial physician-ordered gene panels, we identified clinically significant pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 13% of patients (n42/324). CFHR3-CFHR1 homozygous deletion was detected in an additional 13 patients with aHUS without a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Diagnostic yield of the initial physician-ordered gene panel was 20% and varied between groups. Retrospective exome analysis identified 18 patients with a previously unknown pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a kidney disease gene and eight patients with a high-risk APOL1 genotype. Overall, retrospective exome analysis increased the diagnostic yield of panel-based testing from 20% to 30%. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of a broad and collaborative approach between the clinical laboratory and their physician clients that employs additional analysis when a targeted panel of kidney disease-causing genes does not return a clinically meaningful result.
AB - Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a useful tool for evaluating patients with suspected genetic kidney disease. Clinical practice relies on the use of targeted gene panels that are ordered based on patient presentation. We compare the diagnostic yield of clinical panel-based testing to exome analysis. Methods In total, 324 consecutive patients underwent physician-ordered, panel-based NGS testing between December 2014 and October 2018. Gene panels were available for four clinical phenotypes, including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n224), nephrotic syndrome (n56), cystic kidney disease (n26), and Alport syndrome (n13). Variants were analyzed and clinical reports were signed out by a pathologist or clinical geneticist at the time of testing. Subsequently, all patients underwent retrospective exome analysis to detect additional clinically significant variants in kidney disease genes that were not analyzed as part of the initial clinical gene panel. Resulting variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2015 guidelines. Results In the initial physician-ordered gene panels, we identified clinically significant pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 13% of patients (n42/324). CFHR3-CFHR1 homozygous deletion was detected in an additional 13 patients with aHUS without a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Diagnostic yield of the initial physician-ordered gene panel was 20% and varied between groups. Retrospective exome analysis identified 18 patients with a previously unknown pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a kidney disease gene and eight patients with a high-risk APOL1 genotype. Overall, retrospective exome analysis increased the diagnostic yield of panel-based testing from 20% to 30%. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of a broad and collaborative approach between the clinical laboratory and their physician clients that employs additional analysis when a targeted panel of kidney disease-causing genes does not return a clinically meaningful result.
KW - clinical
KW - cystic
KW - exome
KW - genetics
KW - genetics
KW - genomics
KW - high-throughput nucleotide sequencing
KW - kidney
KW - kidney diseases
KW - medical
KW - next generation sequencing
KW - panel
KW - retrospective studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121239803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34067/KID.0001342020
DO - 10.34067/KID.0001342020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121239803
SN - 2641-7650
VL - 1
SP - 772
EP - 780
JO - Kidney360
JF - Kidney360
IS - 8
ER -