TY - JOUR
T1 - Bevacizumab versus ranibizumab in the treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion
T2 - 6-month results of the CRAVE study
AU - Rajagopal, Rithwick
AU - Shah, Gaurav K.
AU - Blinder, Kevin J.
AU - Altaweel, Michael
AU - Eliott, Dean
AU - Wee, Raymond
AU - Cooper, Blake
AU - Walia, Harpreet
AU - Smith, Bradley
AU - Joseph, Daniel P.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Background and Objective: To compare efficacy of monthly treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Patients and Methods: Randomized, multicenter, comparative trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01428388). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive monthly treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. The primary outcome was change in central foveal thickness at 6 months compared to baseline. Results: The trial randomized 98 patients to treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. At 6 months, there were no differences in change in central foveal thickness between groups (bevacizumab: mean reduction of 212.6 μm, 95% confidence interval [CI], -288.3 to -137.0; ranibizumab: mean reduction of 243.8 μm, 95% CI, -309.6 to -178.0; P = .72, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Both groups showed similar functional outcomes (bevacizumab: 0.33 logMAR gain, 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.18; ranibizumab: 0.34 log- MAR gain, 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.23; P = .38, ANOVA). Conclusion: In the treatment of retinal vein occlusion, bevacizumab and ranibizumab have similar effects on reducing macular thickness and improving visual acuity.
AB - Background and Objective: To compare efficacy of monthly treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Patients and Methods: Randomized, multicenter, comparative trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01428388). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive monthly treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. The primary outcome was change in central foveal thickness at 6 months compared to baseline. Results: The trial randomized 98 patients to treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. At 6 months, there were no differences in change in central foveal thickness between groups (bevacizumab: mean reduction of 212.6 μm, 95% confidence interval [CI], -288.3 to -137.0; ranibizumab: mean reduction of 243.8 μm, 95% CI, -309.6 to -178.0; P = .72, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Both groups showed similar functional outcomes (bevacizumab: 0.33 logMAR gain, 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.18; ranibizumab: 0.34 log- MAR gain, 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.23; P = .38, ANOVA). Conclusion: In the treatment of retinal vein occlusion, bevacizumab and ranibizumab have similar effects on reducing macular thickness and improving visual acuity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942515993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/23258160-20150909-09
DO - 10.3928/23258160-20150909-09
M3 - Article
C2 - 26431300
AN - SCOPUS:84942515993
SN - 2325-8160
VL - 46
SP - 844
EP - 850
JO - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
JF - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
IS - 8
ER -