Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-sT-segment- elevation myocardial infarction the CRUSADE (can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress ADverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) bleeding score

  • Sumeet Subherwal
  • , Richard G. Bach
  • , Anita Y. Chen
  • , Brian F. Gage
  • , Sunil V. Rao
  • , L. Kristin Newby
  • , Tracy Y. Wang
  • , W. Brian Gibler
  • , E. Magnus Ohman
  • , Matthew T. Roe
  • , Charles V. Pollack
  • , Eric D. Peterson
  • , Karen P. Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

911 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background-Treatments for non-ST-segment- elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) reduce ischemic events but increase bleeding. Baseline prediction of bleeding risk can complement ischemic risk prediction for optimization of NSTEMI care; however, existing models are not well suited for this purpose. Methods and Results-We developed (n=71 277) and validated (n= 17 857) a model that identifies 8 independent baseline predictors of in-hospital major bleeding among community-treated NSTEMI patients enrolled in the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Model performance was tested by c statistics in the derivation and validation cohorts and according to postadmission treatment (ie, invasive and antithrombotic therapy). The CRUSADE bleeding score (range 1 to 100 points) was created by assignment of weighted integers that corresponded to the coefficient of each variable. The rate of major bleeding increased by bleeding risk score quintiles: 3.1% for those at very low risk (score <20); 5.5% for those at low risk (score 21-30); 8.6% for those at moderate risk (score 31-40); 11.9% for those at high risk (score 41-50); and 19.5% for those at very high risk (score >50; P tend <0.001). The c statistics for the major bleeding model (derivation=0.72 and validation=0.71) and risk score (derivation=0.71 and validation=0.70) were similar. The c statistics for the model among treatment subgroups were as follows: >2 antithrombotics=0.72; <2 antithrombotics=0.73; invasive approach=0.73; conservative approach=0.68. Conclusions-The CRUSADE bleeding score quantifies risk for in-hospital major bleeding across all postadmission treatments, which enhances baseline risk assessment for NSTEMI care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1873-1882
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation
Volume119
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 14 2009

Keywords

  • Bleeding
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Risk assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-sT-segment- elevation myocardial infarction the CRUSADE (can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress ADverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) bleeding score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this