Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic chelocystectomy

Steven M. Strasberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

167 Scopus citations


Biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a serious problem. Injury occurs as a result of technical errors or misidentification of ducts. Inexperience, inflammation, and aberrant anatomy are key risk factors. The most serious technical problem is cautery-induced injury. This problem may be avoided by use of cautery under very low power settings in the triangle of Calot. Misidentification injuries occur when the surgeon mistakes the common bile duct or an aberrant right hepatic duct for the cystic duct. This error usually occurs when the surgeon uses the "infundibular" technique to identify the cystic duct. This technique, which depends on seeing the cystic duct flare as it becomes the infundibulum, is especially prone to be misleading in the face of acute inflammation. This technique is unreliable and should not be used alone for anatomic identification of the ducts. It is preferable to use the critical view technique or to perform a cholangiogram.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-547
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2002


  • Biliary injury
  • Critical view
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy


Dive into the research topics of 'Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic chelocystectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this