Automatic processing influences free recall: Converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments

David P. McCabe, Henry L. Roediger, Jeffrey D. Karpicke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Dual-process theories of retrieval suggest that controlled and automatic processing contribute to memory performance. Free recall tests are often considered pure measures of recollection, assessing only the controlled process. We report two experiments demonstrating that automatic processes also influence free recall. Experiment 1 used inclusion and exclusion tasks to estimate recollection and automaticity in free recall, adopting a new variant of the process dissociation procedure. Dividing attention during study selectively reduced the recollection estimate but did not affect the automatic component. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, and subjects additionally reported remember-know-guess judgments during recall in the inclusion condition. In the latter task, dividing attention during study reduced remember judgments for studied items, but know responses were unaffected. Results from both methods indicated that free recall is partly driven by automatic processes. Thus, we conclude that retrieval in free recall tests is not driven solely by conscious recollection (or remembering) but also by automatic influences of the same sort believed to drive priming on implicit memory tests. Sometimes items come to mind without volition in free recall.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-402
Number of pages14
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Familiarity
  • Free recall
  • Memory
  • Process dissociation
  • Recollection
  • Remember-know

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automatic processing influences free recall: Converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this