TY - JOUR
T1 - Author Correction
T2 - Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials (npj Digital Medicine, (2022), 5, 1, (71), 10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w)
AU - NRG Prostate Cancer AI Consortium
AU - Esteva, Andre
AU - Feng, Jean
AU - van der Wal, Douwe
AU - Huang, Shih Cheng
AU - Simko, Jeffry P.
AU - DeVries, Sandy
AU - Chen, Emmalyn
AU - Schaeffer, Edward M.
AU - Morgan, Todd M.
AU - Sun, Yilun
AU - Ghorbani, Amirata
AU - Naik, Nikhil
AU - Nathawani, Dhruv
AU - Socher, Richard
AU - Michalski, Jeff M.
AU - Roach, Mack
AU - Pisansky, Thomas M.
AU - Monson, Jedidiah M.
AU - Naz, Farah
AU - Wallace, James
AU - Ferguson, Michelle J.
AU - Bahary, Jean Paul
AU - Zou, James
AU - Lungren, Matthew
AU - Yeung, Serena
AU - Ross, Ashley E.
AU - Kucharczyk, Michael
AU - Souhami, Luis
AU - Ballas, Leslie
AU - Peters, Christopher A.
AU - Liu, Sandy
AU - Balogh, Alexander G.
AU - Randolph-Jackson, Pamela D.
AU - Schwartz, David L.
AU - Girvigian, Michael R.
AU - Saito, Naoyuki G.
AU - Raben, Adam
AU - Rabinovitch, Rachel A.
AU - Katato, Khalil
AU - Sandler, Howard M.
AU - Tran, Phuoc T.
AU - Spratt, Daniel E.
AU - Pugh, Stephanie
AU - Feng, Felix Y.
AU - Mohamad, Osama
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - The original version of the published Article contained an error in the description of the prostate tissue samples in the Methods and Results sections, which stated that “pretreatment biopsy samples” and “pretreatment prostate biopsies” were used in this study. Both instances have been updated to “pretreatment and posttreatment prostate tissue”, and these changes are reflected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article. Furthermore, we have added descriptions of the use of posttreatment prostate tissue during model development throughout the Article. In the interest of transparency and clinical relevance, we repeated the evaluation of model performance in the validation set after removing any cases with post-treatment prostate tissue. This results in a slightly smaller cohort (n = 931) for validation, compared to the 20% validation set used in the original paper, and still demonstrates similar performance to the MMAI algorithms using only pretreatment tissue for each clinical endpoint. Table 2 has been added to the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.
AB - The original version of the published Article contained an error in the description of the prostate tissue samples in the Methods and Results sections, which stated that “pretreatment biopsy samples” and “pretreatment prostate biopsies” were used in this study. Both instances have been updated to “pretreatment and posttreatment prostate tissue”, and these changes are reflected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article. Furthermore, we have added descriptions of the use of posttreatment prostate tissue during model development throughout the Article. In the interest of transparency and clinical relevance, we repeated the evaluation of model performance in the validation set after removing any cases with post-treatment prostate tissue. This results in a slightly smaller cohort (n = 931) for validation, compared to the 20% validation set used in the original paper, and still demonstrates similar performance to the MMAI algorithms using only pretreatment tissue for each clinical endpoint. Table 2 has been added to the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148683526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41746-023-00769-z
DO - 10.1038/s41746-023-00769-z
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 36813827
AN - SCOPUS:85148683526
SN - 2398-6352
VL - 6
JO - npj Digital Medicine
JF - npj Digital Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 27
ER -