TY - JOUR
T1 - Asthma exacerbations in African Americans treated for 1 year with combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone
AU - Bailey, William
AU - Castro, Mario
AU - Matz, Jonathan
AU - White, Martha
AU - Dransfield, Mark
AU - Yancey, Steve
AU - Ortega, Hector
N1 - Funding Information:
Declaration of interest: The study was funded and sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The authors thank the investigators and staff at all study sites and at GlaxoSmithKline who helped to organize and run the study (SFA103153). In addition, they thank Lynne Schoaf, RN for overseeing study conduct; Lisa Edwards, PhD for statistical analyses and expertise; and Alan Kamada, PharmD for editorial assistance with manuscript preparation. The clinical-trials.gov registry number for this study is NCT00102765.
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Objective: This long-term prospective study was conducted in African Americans with persistent asthma to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), and the long-acting beta-agonist, salmeterol, compared with FP alone. Research and design methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center trial in adolescent and adult subjects ≥12 years of age symptomatic on a low dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The study consisted of a 2-week screening period on low dose ICS; a 4-week open-label FP 250 mcg twice daily (BID) run-in; a 52-week double-blind period (FP/salmeterol [FSC] 100/50 mcg [n = 239] or FP 100 mcg [n = 236] BID), and a 4-week FP 250 mcg BID run-out period. Annualized exacerbation rate was the primary outcome for comparing the two treatments. Other measures of asthma control included peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and albuterol use. Safety was assessed through adverse events. Results: Exacerbation rates were not significantly different in those treated with FSC 100/50 mcg (0.449 per year) compared with FP 100 mcg (0.529 per year, p = 0.169). When the per-protocol analysis was applied, the rates were 0.465 and 0.769 per year for FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg, respectively. Treatment with FSC 100/50 mcg provided statistically greater improvements in lung function measures and nighttime awakenings (p ≤ 0.050) and demonstrated numerically lower daily symptoms (p = 0.216) and albuterol use (p = 0.122). Two subjects treated with FSC 100/50 mcg were hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation compared to three treated with FP 100 mcg. The overall incidence of adverse effects during double-blind treatment was similar between the FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg treatment groups (61% and 68%, respectively). Frequent study visits were required of subjects during this long-term study, and it remains unknown whether this intervention may affect generalizability. Conclusion: In this large, prospective study among African Americans with asthma, the addition of salmeterol to FP resulted in a similar low rate of exacerbations and improved other markers of asthma control. Both FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg were well-tolerated, and the overall safety-profiles were similar over 1 year of treatment.
AB - Objective: This long-term prospective study was conducted in African Americans with persistent asthma to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), and the long-acting beta-agonist, salmeterol, compared with FP alone. Research and design methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center trial in adolescent and adult subjects ≥12 years of age symptomatic on a low dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The study consisted of a 2-week screening period on low dose ICS; a 4-week open-label FP 250 mcg twice daily (BID) run-in; a 52-week double-blind period (FP/salmeterol [FSC] 100/50 mcg [n = 239] or FP 100 mcg [n = 236] BID), and a 4-week FP 250 mcg BID run-out period. Annualized exacerbation rate was the primary outcome for comparing the two treatments. Other measures of asthma control included peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and albuterol use. Safety was assessed through adverse events. Results: Exacerbation rates were not significantly different in those treated with FSC 100/50 mcg (0.449 per year) compared with FP 100 mcg (0.529 per year, p = 0.169). When the per-protocol analysis was applied, the rates were 0.465 and 0.769 per year for FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg, respectively. Treatment with FSC 100/50 mcg provided statistically greater improvements in lung function measures and nighttime awakenings (p ≤ 0.050) and demonstrated numerically lower daily symptoms (p = 0.216) and albuterol use (p = 0.122). Two subjects treated with FSC 100/50 mcg were hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation compared to three treated with FP 100 mcg. The overall incidence of adverse effects during double-blind treatment was similar between the FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg treatment groups (61% and 68%, respectively). Frequent study visits were required of subjects during this long-term study, and it remains unknown whether this intervention may affect generalizability. Conclusion: In this large, prospective study among African Americans with asthma, the addition of salmeterol to FP resulted in a similar low rate of exacerbations and improved other markers of asthma control. Both FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg were well-tolerated, and the overall safety-profiles were similar over 1 year of treatment.
KW - African Americans
KW - Asthma
KW - Exacerbations
KW - Fluticasone
KW - Salmeterol
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46449109674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1185/03007990802119111
DO - 10.1185/03007990802119111
M3 - Article
C2 - 18462564
AN - SCOPUS:46449109674
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 24
SP - 1669
EP - 1682
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 6
ER -