Associations Between Cannabis Messaging and Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Product Perceptions, Use, and Use Intentions Among a Sample of US Young Adults

  • Cassidy R. LoParco
  • , Matthew E. Rossheim
  • , Yuxian Cui
  • , Darcey M. McCready
  • , Katelyn F. Romm
  • , Yan Wang
  • , Y. Tony Yang
  • , Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg
  • , Hannah Szlyk
  • , Erin Kasson
  • , Carla J. Berg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Since the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act, derived intoxicating cannabis products (DICPs) emerged as largely unregulated products; meanwhile, traditional cannabis use has increased. To inform effective prevention, research is needed to assess differences in motives for using cannabis only versus both cannabis and DICPs, as well as use-related consequences. Methods: We analyzed survey data (June–November 2023) from 4,031 US young adults ages 18–34 (average age = 26.9; 63.9% White; 59.0% female; aiming for ∼50% past-month cannabis use). The analytic sample included participants reporting past-month cannabis use (n = 1,968). Two cross-sectional mediation models were conducted to examine: 1) cannabis use motives (social/cognitive enhancement and coping) in relation to use-related consequences (psychophysiological and sociobehavioral) via use category (cannabis-only vs. cannabis-DICP co-use) and 2) consequences in relation to use category via use motives. Results: Overall, 54.4% reported cannabis-only use and 45.6% reported cannabis-DICP co-use. Greater enhancement and coping motives were associated with cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use). Regarding Model #1, lower cannabis coping motives and cannabis-DICP use (vs. cannabis-only use) were associated with greater psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences, and the associations between coping and enhancement motives and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly mediated via cannabis-DICP co-use. For Model #2, lower psychophysiological and greater sociobehavioral consequences were associated with greater coping and enhancement motives, greater sociobehavioral consequences was associated with higher odds of cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use), and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly associated with cannabis-DICP co-use through enhancement and coping motives. Conclusions: Considering the risks associated with cannabis and DICP use, future intervention and prevention efforts should focus on the observed associations to reduce risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2025-2033
Number of pages9
JournalSubstance Use and Misuse
Volume60
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Marijuana
  • delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
  • psychoactive
  • public health
  • substance use motives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations Between Cannabis Messaging and Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Product Perceptions, Use, and Use Intentions Among a Sample of US Young Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this