Association of State Medicaid Expansion with Quality of Care and Outcomes for Low-Income Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rishi K. Wadhera, Deepak L. Bhatt, Tracy Y. Wang, Di Lu, Joseph Lucas, Jose F. Figueroa, Kirk N. Garratt, Robert W. Yeh, Karen E. Joynt Maddox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Lack of insurance is associated with worse care and outcomes among adults hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear whether states' decision to expand Medicaid eligibility under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2014 were associated with improved quality of care and outcomes among low-income patients hospitalized with AMI. Objective: To investigate whether rates of uninsurance, quality of care, and outcomes changed among patients hospitalized for AMI 3 years after states elected to expand Medicaid compared with nonexpansion states. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study completed at hospitals participating in National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry. Participants were patients younger than 65 years hospitalized for AMI from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Exposures: State Medicaid expansion in 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of uninsured and Medicaid-insured hospitalizations for AMI in states that expanded Medicaid vs those that did not. Comparison of in-hospital care quality, procedure use, and mortality between expansion and nonexpansion states for the years prior to and after Medicaid expansion. Hierarchical logistic regressions models were used to assess the association between Medicaid expansion and outcomes. Results: The initial cohort included 325343 patients. Uninsured AMI hospitalizations declined in expansion states (18.0% [4395 of 24358 hospitalizations] to 8.4% [2638 of 31382 hospitalizations]) and more modestly in nonexpansion states (25.6% [7963 of 31137 hospitalizations] to 21.1% [8668 of 41120 hospitalizations]) from 2012 to 2016 (P <.001 difference in trend expansion vs nonexpansion). Medicaid coverage increased from 7.5% (1818 of 24358 hospitalizations) to 14.4% (4502 of 31382 hospitalizations) in expansion states and 6.2% (1924 of 31137 hospitalizations) to 6.6% (2717 of 41120 hospitalizations) in nonexpansion states (P <.001). The low-income cohort included 55737 patients across 765 sites. In expansion states, low-income adults' odds of receipt of defect-free care increased (76.3% to 75.9%, adjusted odds ratio 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21) but to a lesser degree than in nonexpansion states (72.8% to 74.5%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.30-1.47; P for interaction <.001). There was no change in use of most procedures (ie, percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) in expansion compared with nonexpansion states. Improvement in in-hospital mortality was similar between expansion and nonexpansion states (3.2% to 2.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.12 vs 3.3% to 3.0%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99; P for interaction =.48). Conclusions and Relevance: Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant reduction in rates of uninsurance among patients hospitalized with AMI. Quality of care and outcomes did not improve among low-income adults in expansion compared with nonexpansion states. Hospital care for AMI may be less sensitive to insurance than has been recognized in the past.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-127
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Cardiology
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of State Medicaid Expansion with Quality of Care and Outcomes for Low-Income Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this