Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction

Stephen W. Waldo, James M. McCabe, Cashel O'Brien, Kevin F. Kennedy, Karen E. Joynt, Robert W. Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations


Background Public reporting of procedural outcomes may create disincentives to provide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for critically ill patients. Objectives This study evaluated the association between public reporting with procedural management and outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified all patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI in states with public reporting (Massachusetts and New York) and regionally comparable states without public reporting (Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) between 2005 and 2011. Procedural management and in-hospital outcomes were stratified by public reporting. Results Among 84,121 patients hospitalized with AMI, 57,629 (69%) underwent treatment in a public reporting state. After multivariate adjustment, percutaneous revascularization was performed less often in public reporting states than in nonreporting states (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67 to 0.96), especially among older patients (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91), those with Medicare insurance (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91), and those presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.71) or concomitant cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.70). Overall, patients with AMI in public reporting states had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality rates (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.37) than those in nonreporting states. This was observed predominantly in patients who did not receive percutaneous revascularization in public reporting states (adjusted OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.50), whereas those undergoing the procedure had lower mortality (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.83). Conclusions Public reporting is associated with reduced percutaneous revascularization and increased in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI, particularly among patients not selected for PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1119-1126
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Issue number11
StatePublished - Mar 24 2015


  • Acute coronary
  • coronary intervention
  • public reporting
  • syndromes(s) percutaneous

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this