Assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: A comparison of 2 METHODS

George A. Mashour; Christopher Kent; Paul Picton; Satya Krishna Ramachandran; Kevin K. Tremper; Christopher R. Turner; Amy Shanks; Michael S. Avidan

doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad

Assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: A comparison of 2 METHODS

George A. Mashour, Christopher Kent, Paul Picton, Satya Krishna Ramachandran, Kevin K. Tremper, Christopher R. Turner, Amy Shanks, Michael S. Avidan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superiority of the modified Brice interview over quality assurance techniques in detecting intraoperative awareness with explicit recall has not been demonstrated definitively. METHODS: We studied a single patient cohort to compare the detection of definite awareness using a single modified Brice interview (postoperative day 28-30) versus quality assurance data (postoperative day 1). RESULTS: The incidence of awareness based on the modified Brice interview was 19 per 18,847 or 0.1%. Fewer awareness cases (incidence 0.02%) were detected by the quality assurance approach (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified Brice interview is the preferred modality for assessing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	889-891
Number of pages	3
Journal	Anesthesia and analgesia
Volume	116
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad
State	Published - May 2013

Access to Document

10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad

Cite this

@article{ef12354d253b43fe8cdcaa5945ca6b7b,

title = "Assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: A comparison of 2 METHODS",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: Superiority of the modified Brice interview over quality assurance techniques in detecting intraoperative awareness with explicit recall has not been demonstrated definitively. METHODS: We studied a single patient cohort to compare the detection of definite awareness using a single modified Brice interview (postoperative day 28-30) versus quality assurance data (postoperative day 1). RESULTS: The incidence of awareness based on the modified Brice interview was 19 per 18,847 or 0.1%. Fewer awareness cases (incidence 0.02%) were detected by the quality assurance approach (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified Brice interview is the preferred modality for assessing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall.",

author = "Mashour, {George A.} and Christopher Kent and Paul Picton and Ramachandran, {Satya Krishna} and Tremper, {Kevin K.} and Turner, {Christopher R.} and Amy Shanks and Avidan, {Michael S.}",

year = "2013",

month = may,

doi = "10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad",

language = "English",

volume = "116",

pages = "889--891",

journal = "Anesthesia and analgesia",

issn = "0003-2999",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall

T2 - A comparison of 2 METHODS

AU - Mashour, George A.

AU - Kent, Christopher

AU - Picton, Paul

AU - Ramachandran, Satya Krishna

AU - Tremper, Kevin K.

AU - Turner, Christopher R.

AU - Shanks, Amy

AU - Avidan, Michael S.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Superiority of the modified Brice interview over quality assurance techniques in detecting intraoperative awareness with explicit recall has not been demonstrated definitively. METHODS: We studied a single patient cohort to compare the detection of definite awareness using a single modified Brice interview (postoperative day 28-30) versus quality assurance data (postoperative day 1). RESULTS: The incidence of awareness based on the modified Brice interview was 19 per 18,847 or 0.1%. Fewer awareness cases (incidence 0.02%) were detected by the quality assurance approach (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified Brice interview is the preferred modality for assessing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall.

AB - BACKGROUND: Superiority of the modified Brice interview over quality assurance techniques in detecting intraoperative awareness with explicit recall has not been demonstrated definitively. METHODS: We studied a single patient cohort to compare the detection of definite awareness using a single modified Brice interview (postoperative day 28-30) versus quality assurance data (postoperative day 1). RESULTS: The incidence of awareness based on the modified Brice interview was 19 per 18,847 or 0.1%. Fewer awareness cases (incidence 0.02%) were detected by the quality assurance approach (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified Brice interview is the preferred modality for assessing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876675266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318281e9ad

M3 - Article

C2 - 23460567

AN - SCOPUS:84876675266

SN - 0003-2999

VL - 116

SP - 889

EP - 891

JO - Anesthesia and analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and analgesia

IS - 4

ER -

Assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: A comparison of 2 METHODS

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this