TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of rest and cold pressor test-stimulated myocardial blood flow with 13N-ammonia and PET
AU - Schindler, Thomas H.
AU - Zhang, Xiao Li
AU - Prior, John O.
AU - Cadenas, Jerson
AU - Dahlbom, Magnus
AU - Sayre, James
AU - Schelbert, Heinrich R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the PET Imaging and Cyclotron staff for their support in the imaging studies, and Victoria Bender for her secretarial assistance. This work was supported by a Research Grant HL 33177, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - Purpose: We investigated the intraobserver reproducibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements with PET at rest and during cold pressor test (CPT), and the interobserver agreement. Methods: Twenty normal volunteers were studied. Using 13N-ammonia, MBF was measured at rest and during CPT and measurement was repeated in a 1-day session (short-term reproducibility; SR). After a follow-up of 2 weeks, MBF was measured again at rest and during CPT and compared with the initial baseline measurement (long-term reproducibility; LR). In addition, adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF increases were assessed. Results: Assessment of the SR did not show a significant absolute difference in MBF at rest, MBF during CPT or the endothelium-related change in MBF from rest to CPT (ΔMBF) (0.09 ± 0.10, 0.11 ± 0.09, and 0.08 ± 0.05 ml/g/min; p = NS), and they were linearly correlated (r = 0.72, r = 0.76 and r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Corresponding values for standard error of the estimate (SEE), as indicative for the range of MBF measurement error, were 0.14, 0.14, and 0.09 ml/g/min. The LR yielded relatively higher but non-significant absolute differences in the MBF at rest, MBF during CPT and ΔMBF (0.10 ± 0.10, 0.14 ± 0.10, and 0.19 ± 0.10 ml/g/min; p = NS), and paired MBFs significantly correlated (r = 0.75, r = 0.71, and r = 0.60; p < 0.001). Corresponding SEEs were 0.13, 0.15, and 0.16 ml/g/min. The interobserver analysis yielded a high correlation for MBF at rest, MBF during CPT, and hyperemic MBF (r = 0.96, SEE=0.04; r = 0.78, SEE=0.11; and r = 0.87, SEE=0.28; p < 0.0001, respectively), and also a good interobserver correlation for ΔMBF (r = 0.62, SEE=0.09; p < 0.003). Conclusion: Short- and long-term MBF responses to CPT, as an index for endothelium-related coronary vasomotion, can be measured reproducibly with 13N-ammonia PET. In addition, the high interobserver reproducibility for repeat analysis of MBF values suggests the measurements to be largely operator independent.
AB - Purpose: We investigated the intraobserver reproducibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements with PET at rest and during cold pressor test (CPT), and the interobserver agreement. Methods: Twenty normal volunteers were studied. Using 13N-ammonia, MBF was measured at rest and during CPT and measurement was repeated in a 1-day session (short-term reproducibility; SR). After a follow-up of 2 weeks, MBF was measured again at rest and during CPT and compared with the initial baseline measurement (long-term reproducibility; LR). In addition, adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF increases were assessed. Results: Assessment of the SR did not show a significant absolute difference in MBF at rest, MBF during CPT or the endothelium-related change in MBF from rest to CPT (ΔMBF) (0.09 ± 0.10, 0.11 ± 0.09, and 0.08 ± 0.05 ml/g/min; p = NS), and they were linearly correlated (r = 0.72, r = 0.76 and r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Corresponding values for standard error of the estimate (SEE), as indicative for the range of MBF measurement error, were 0.14, 0.14, and 0.09 ml/g/min. The LR yielded relatively higher but non-significant absolute differences in the MBF at rest, MBF during CPT and ΔMBF (0.10 ± 0.10, 0.14 ± 0.10, and 0.19 ± 0.10 ml/g/min; p = NS), and paired MBFs significantly correlated (r = 0.75, r = 0.71, and r = 0.60; p < 0.001). Corresponding SEEs were 0.13, 0.15, and 0.16 ml/g/min. The interobserver analysis yielded a high correlation for MBF at rest, MBF during CPT, and hyperemic MBF (r = 0.96, SEE=0.04; r = 0.78, SEE=0.11; and r = 0.87, SEE=0.28; p < 0.0001, respectively), and also a good interobserver correlation for ΔMBF (r = 0.62, SEE=0.09; p < 0.003). Conclusion: Short- and long-term MBF responses to CPT, as an index for endothelium-related coronary vasomotion, can be measured reproducibly with 13N-ammonia PET. In addition, the high interobserver reproducibility for repeat analysis of MBF values suggests the measurements to be largely operator independent.
KW - Blood flow
KW - Circulation
KW - Endothelium
KW - Reproducibility
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547414555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-007-0378-5
DO - 10.1007/s00259-007-0378-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 17334762
AN - SCOPUS:34547414555
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 34
SP - 1178
EP - 1188
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
IS - 8
ER -