Assessment of ICD-10-CM code assignment validity for case finding of outpatient anticoagulant-related bleeding among Medicare beneficiaries

Nadine Shehab, Robert Ziemba, Kyle N. Campbell, Andrew I. Geller, Ruth N. Moro, Brian F. Gage, Daniel S. Budnitz, Tsu Hsuan Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess performance of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) code assignments for identifying bleeding events resulting in emergency department visits and hospitalizations among outpatient Medicare beneficiaries prescribed anticoagulants. Methods: Performance of 206 ICD-10-CM code assignments indicative of bleeding, five anticoagulant adverse effect/poisoning codes, and five coagulopathy codes (according to Medicare Parts A and B claims) as assessed among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries prescribed anticoagulants between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2016 (according to Part D claims). Structured medical record review was the gold standard for validating the presence of anticoagulant-related bleeding. Sensitivity was adjusted to correct for partial verification bias due to sampling design. Results: Based on the study sample of 1166 records (583 cases, 583 controls), 57 of 206 codes yielded the optimal performance for anticoagulant-related bleeding (diagnostic odds ratio, 51; positive predictive value (PPV), 75.7% [95% CI, 72.0%-79.1%]; adjusted sensitivity, 70.0% [95% CI, 63.2%-77.7%]). Codes for intracranial bleeding demonstrated the highest PPV (85.0%) and adjusted sensitivity (91.0%). Bleeding codes in the primary position demonstrated high PPV (86.9%), but low adjusted sensitivity (36.0%). The adjusted sensitivity improved to 69.5% when codes in a secondary position were added. Only one adverse effect/poisoning code was used, appearing in 7.8% of cases and controls (PPV, 71.4% and adjusted sensitivity, 6.8%). Conclusions: Performance of ICD-10-CM code assignments for bleeding among patients prescribed anticoagulants varied by bleed type and code position. Adverse effect/poisoning codes were not commonly used and would have missed over 90% of anticoagulant-related bleeding cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)951-964
Number of pages14
JournalPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • International Classification of Diseases
  • accuracy
  • adverse drug events
  • anticoagulants
  • bleeding
  • diagnosis codes
  • hemorrhage
  • pharmacoepidemiology
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of ICD-10-CM code assignment validity for case finding of outpatient anticoagulant-related bleeding among Medicare beneficiaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this