TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae
T2 - Insights from two randomized trials
AU - Shorr, Andrew F.
AU - Kollef, Marin
AU - Eckburg, Paul B.
AU - Llorens, Lily
AU - Friedland, H. David
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Forest Laboratories, Inc. Forest Laboratories, Inc., was involved in the design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and decision to present these results. Preliminary results of these data were presented at the 2011 European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) meeting; May 7–10, 2011; Milan, Italy.
Funding Information:
Scientific Therapeutics Information, Inc. provided editorial assistance, which was funded by Forest Research Institute, Inc.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - Ceftaroline fosamil resulted in higher cure rates than ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in 2 randomized trials (FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2). The present analysis examines the subgroup of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to determine whether the apparent difference in cure rates persists after adjusting for potential covariates. We retrospectively pooled subjects with S. pneumoniae isolated at baseline in the original studies and employed logistic regression to evaluate the independent relationship between clinical cure and treatment with ceftaroline. Covariates evaluated included demographics, severity of illness, bacteremia, and pathogen characteristics. The final cohort included 139 subjects (69 ceftaroline, 70 ceftriaxone). Unadjusted cure rates were 85.5% and 68.6% (P = 0.009) in the ceftaroline and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. After logistic regression, ceftaroline remained associated with higher cure rates. Our findings indicate that ceftaroline may result in improved outcomes of S. pneumoniae pneumonia. Formal clinical trials are warranted to confirm this hypothesis.
AB - Ceftaroline fosamil resulted in higher cure rates than ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in 2 randomized trials (FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2). The present analysis examines the subgroup of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to determine whether the apparent difference in cure rates persists after adjusting for potential covariates. We retrospectively pooled subjects with S. pneumoniae isolated at baseline in the original studies and employed logistic regression to evaluate the independent relationship between clinical cure and treatment with ceftaroline. Covariates evaluated included demographics, severity of illness, bacteremia, and pathogen characteristics. The final cohort included 139 subjects (69 ceftaroline, 70 ceftriaxone). Unadjusted cure rates were 85.5% and 68.6% (P = 0.009) in the ceftaroline and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. After logistic regression, ceftaroline remained associated with higher cure rates. Our findings indicate that ceftaroline may result in improved outcomes of S. pneumoniae pneumonia. Formal clinical trials are warranted to confirm this hypothesis.
KW - Ceftaroline fosamil
KW - Ceftriaxone
KW - Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
KW - Streptococcus pneumoniae
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873721190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 23357290
AN - SCOPUS:84873721190
SN - 0732-8893
VL - 75
SP - 298
EP - 303
JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
IS - 3
ER -