Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of a Plasma Amyloid Probability Score to Estimate Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Findings among Adults with Cognitive Impairment

  • Yan Hu
  • , Kristopher M. Kirmess
  • , Matthew R. Meyer
  • , Gil D. Rabinovici
  • , Constantine Gatsonis
  • , Barry A. Siegel
  • , Rachel A. Whitmer
  • , Charles Apgar
  • , Lucy Hanna
  • , Michio Kanekiyo
  • , June Kaplow
  • , Akihiko Koyama
  • , David Verbel
  • , Mary S. Holubasch
  • , Stephanie S. Knapik
  • , Jason Connor
  • , John H. Contois
  • , Erin N. Jackson
  • , Scott E. Harpstrite
  • , Randall J. Bateman
  • David M. Holtzman, Philip B. Verghese, Ilana Fogelman, Joel B. Braunstein, Kevin E. Yarasheski, Tim West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance: The diagnostic evaluation for Alzheimer disease may be improved by a blood-based diagnostic test identifying presence of brain amyloid plaque pathology. Objective: To determine the clinical performance associated with a diagnostic algorithm incorporating plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) 42:40 ratio, patient age, and apoE proteotype to identify brain amyloid status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study includes analysis from 2 independent cross-sectional cohort studies: the discovery cohort of the Plasma Test for Amyloidosis Risk Screening (PARIS) study, a prospective add-on to the Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning study, including 249 patients from 2018 to 2019, and MissionAD, a dataset of 437 biobanked patient samples obtained at screenings during 2016 to 2019. Data were analyzed from May to November 2020. Exposures: Amyloid detected in blood and by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the diagnostic performance of plasma Aβ42:40 ratio, together with apoE proteotype and age, for identifying amyloid PET status, assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: All 686 participants (mean [SD] age 73.2 [6.3] years; 368 [53.6%] men; 378 participants [55.1%] with amyloid PET findings) had symptoms of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. The AUC of plasma Aβ42:40 ratio for PARIS was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) for MissionAD. Ratio cutoffs for Aβ42:40 based on the Youden index were similar between cohorts (PARIS: 0.089; MissionAD: 0.092). A logistic regression model (LRM) incorporating Aβ42:40 ratio, apoE proteotype, and age improved diagnostic performance within each cohort (PARIS: AUC, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.91]; MissionAD: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.92]), and overall accuracy was 78% (95% CI, 72%-83%) for PARIS and 83% (95% CI, 79%-86%) for MissionAD. The model developed on the prospectively collected samples from PARIS performed well on the MissionAD samples (AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.91]; accuracy, 78% [95% CI, 74%-82%]). Training the LRM on combined cohorts yielded an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) and accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 78%-84%). The output of this LRM is the Amyloid Probability Score (APS). For clinical use, 2 APS cutoff values were established yielding 3 categories, with low, intermediate, and high likelihood of brain amyloid plaque pathology. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that this blood biomarker test could allow for distinguishing individuals with brain amyloid-positive PET findings from individuals with amyloid-negative PET findings and serve as an aid for Alzheimer disease diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E228392
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of a Plasma Amyloid Probability Score to Estimate Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Findings among Adults with Cognitive Impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this