Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program

James M. Dubois, Emily E. Anderson, John Chibnall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


With supplement funding to the Washington University CTSA, the Restoring Professionalism and Integrity in Research (RePAIR) program was developed at Saint Louis University to meet the remediation needs of institutions nationwide regarding investigators who violate research regulations. With the aim of determining the frequency and kinds of wrongdoing at leading research institutions in the United States, as well as institutional responses and levels of interest in a formal remediation program, an online questionnaire was distributed by email to a research integrity officer (RIO) and institutional review board (IRB) chair at all medical schools and comprehensive doctoral institutions in the United States (N = 194). One hundred sixty-one individuals responded (44%) representing 66% of institutions. For those institutions that had both RIOs and IRB chairs responding, 96% had investigated at least one case over the past 2 years; the modal individual response was 3-5 cases, with a range from 0 to more than 16 cases. The most common forms of wrongdoing were violations of procedure, informed consent, research integrity (fabrication, falsification, plagiarism), privacy, and conflict of interest policies. Most RIOs and IRB chairs expressed interest in the RePAIR program, despite concerns about costs and faculty resistance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-213
Number of pages5
JournalClinical and translational science
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2013


  • Ethics
  • Psychosocial
  • Remediation
  • Research integrity
  • Risk management


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this