TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the deviation from the inverse square law for orthovoltage beams with closed-ended applicators
AU - Gräfe, James
AU - Poirier, Yannick
AU - Jacso, Ferenc
AU - Khan, Rao
AU - Liu, Hong Wei
AU - Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In this report, we quantify the divergence from the inverse square law (ISL) of the beam output as a function of distance (standoff) from closed-ended applicators for a modern clinical orthovoltage unit. The divergence is clinically significant exceeding 3% at a 1.2cm distance for 4 × 4 and 10 × 10cm2 closed-ended applicators. For all investigated cases, the measured dose falloff is more rapid than that predicted by the ISL and, therefore, causes a systematic underdose when using the ISL for dose calculations at extended SSD. The observed divergence from the ISL in closed-ended applicators can be explained by the end-plate scattering contribution not accounted for in the ISL calculation. The standoff measurements were also compared to the predictions from a home-built kV dose computation algorithm, kVDoseCalc. The kVDoseCalc computation predicted a more rapid falloff with distance than observed experimentally. The computation and measurements agree to within 1.1% for standoff distances of 3cm or less for 4 × 4cm2 and 10 × 10cm2 field sizes. The overall agreement is within 2.3% for all field sizes and standoff distances measured. No significant deviation from the ISL was observed for open-ended applicators for standoff distances up to 10cm.
AB - In this report, we quantify the divergence from the inverse square law (ISL) of the beam output as a function of distance (standoff) from closed-ended applicators for a modern clinical orthovoltage unit. The divergence is clinically significant exceeding 3% at a 1.2cm distance for 4 × 4 and 10 × 10cm2 closed-ended applicators. For all investigated cases, the measured dose falloff is more rapid than that predicted by the ISL and, therefore, causes a systematic underdose when using the ISL for dose calculations at extended SSD. The observed divergence from the ISL in closed-ended applicators can be explained by the end-plate scattering contribution not accounted for in the ISL calculation. The standoff measurements were also compared to the predictions from a home-built kV dose computation algorithm, kVDoseCalc. The kVDoseCalc computation predicted a more rapid falloff with distance than observed experimentally. The computation and measurements agree to within 1.1% for standoff distances of 3cm or less for 4 × 4cm2 and 10 × 10cm2 field sizes. The overall agreement is within 2.3% for all field sizes and standoff distances measured. No significant deviation from the ISL was observed for open-ended applicators for standoff distances up to 10cm.
KW - Dose computation
KW - Extended source-to-surface distance
KW - Inverse square law
KW - Orthovoltage
KW - kVDoseCalc
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996588100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4893
DO - 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4893
M3 - Article
C2 - 25207421
AN - SCOPUS:84996588100
SN - 1526-9914
VL - 15
SP - 356
EP - 366
JO - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
IS - 4
ER -