Assessing Alignment Using GAP Score and Complications for Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Revision Surgeries for Sagittal Deformity in Previously Fused Spines Using a Satellite Rod Technique

Alexander T. Yahanda, Adam M. Wegner, Eric O. Klineberg, Munish C. Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a surgical technique to restore lumbar lordosis in patients with rigid sagittal deformity. Herein, we report on outcomes of a surgical technique utilizing a 4-rod PSO with satellite rods. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for a cohort of patients who underwent 4-rod PSO revision surgery for sagittal deformity. Procedures were performed by one surgeon at 2 different academic centers between 2004–2018. Alignment outcomes and complications specifically for revision surgeries in previously fused spines were assessed. Results: 40 patients underwent PSO with the satellite rod technique (n = 29 at L3, 72.5%; n = 7 at L4, 17.5%). Mean PSO angle was 28.7 ± 7.6°. Two patients (5%) had rod fracture necessitating revision surgery at 32 and 34 months. Three patients (7.5%) developed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), but none required revision. No patients developed pseudoarthrosis. Mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 13.5 ± 7.3 cm, which decreased to 4.8 ± 7.3 cm (P = 0.002) postoperatively. Mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch improved from 35.9 ± 16.6° preoperatively to 11.8 ± 14.6° postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) improved from 34.7 ± 9.8° preoperatively to 30.1 ± 9.0° (P = 0.026) postoperatively. Mean global alignment and proportion (GAP) score improved from 10 ± 2 preoperatively to 8 ± 2 postoperatively (P < 0.001), which was still considered severely disproportioned. Conclusions: Rod failure rate after PSO with the 4-rod satellite configuration was low. SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and PT significantly improved for these previously-fused patients. Mean GAP score also improved, but was still considered severely disproportioned, likely due to the inability of PSO to correct low LL or PT in previously-fused spines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e262-e268
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume179
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • GAP score
  • Pedicle subtraction osteotomy
  • Revision spine surgery
  • Sagittal deformity
  • Satellite rod
  • Spinal deformity
  • Spine surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Alignment Using GAP Score and Complications for Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Revision Surgeries for Sagittal Deformity in Previously Fused Spines Using a Satellite Rod Technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this