TY - JOUR
T1 - Arterial hypoperfusion as a negative predictive marker for primary hepatic malignancies treated with Y-90 glass microsphere transarterial radioembolization
AU - Kalaghchi, Bita
AU - Ince, Semra
AU - Barnes, Justin
AU - Kiser, Kendall
AU - Chin, Re I.
AU - Mikell, Justin
AU - Badiyan, Shahed
AU - Garcia, Jose
AU - Zoberi, Jacqueline
AU - Doyle, Maria Bernadette Majella
AU - Tan, Benjamin
AU - Kim, Seung
AU - Fraum, Tyler
AU - Kim, Hyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Kalaghchi, Ince, Barnes, Kiser, Chin, Mikell, Badiyan, Garcia, Zoberi, Doyle, Tan, Kim, Fraum and Kim.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Radioembolization with yttrium-90 (Y-90) is utilized to treat primary liver malignancies. The efficacy of this intra-arterial therapy in arterially hypoperfused tumors is not known. Methods: We reviewed data of patients with primary liver tumors treated with Y-90 prescription doses of at least 150 Gy. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment history, imaging-based tumor response assessments, and clinical outcome metrics were recorded. Tumors were classified as arterially hyperperfused versus hypoperfused on post-TARE Y-90 SPECT/CTs or pre-TARE hepatic perfusion SPECT/CTs. Perfusion status was correlated with tumor response assessments and clinical outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to compare survival and progression-free survival. Inverse probability weighting was utilized to account for clinical factors and adjusted multivariable proportional hazards analyses to examine the relationship of quantitative perfusion and cancer outcomes. Results: Of 400 Y-90 treatments, 88 patients received a prescribed dose of at least 150 Gy and had pre- or post-treatment SPECT/CT images. 11 and 77 patients had arterially hypoperfused and hyperperfused lesions, respectively. On dedicated liver MRI or CT at 3 months after Y-90, the complete response rates were 5.6% and 16.5% in the hypoperfused and hyperperfused cohort, respectively (P = 0.60). When controlling for various clinical features, including tumor histology, patients with arterially hypoperfused tumors had significantly shorter progression-free survival (HR 1.87, 95% CI - 1.03 - 3.37, P = 0.039) and greater elsewhere liver (HR 3.36, 95% CI = 1.23 - 9.20, P = 0.019) and distant failure (HR 7.64 (2.71 - 21.54, P < 0.001). In inverse probability weighted analysis, patients with arterially hypoperfused tumors had worse overall survival (P = 0.032). In the quantitative analysis, lower levels of lesion perfusion were also associated with worse clinical outcomes, again controlling for tumor histology. Conclusion: Compared to arterially hyperperfused tumors, hypoperfused primary liver tumors treated with Y-90 may have worse clinical outcomes.
AB - Background: Radioembolization with yttrium-90 (Y-90) is utilized to treat primary liver malignancies. The efficacy of this intra-arterial therapy in arterially hypoperfused tumors is not known. Methods: We reviewed data of patients with primary liver tumors treated with Y-90 prescription doses of at least 150 Gy. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment history, imaging-based tumor response assessments, and clinical outcome metrics were recorded. Tumors were classified as arterially hyperperfused versus hypoperfused on post-TARE Y-90 SPECT/CTs or pre-TARE hepatic perfusion SPECT/CTs. Perfusion status was correlated with tumor response assessments and clinical outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to compare survival and progression-free survival. Inverse probability weighting was utilized to account for clinical factors and adjusted multivariable proportional hazards analyses to examine the relationship of quantitative perfusion and cancer outcomes. Results: Of 400 Y-90 treatments, 88 patients received a prescribed dose of at least 150 Gy and had pre- or post-treatment SPECT/CT images. 11 and 77 patients had arterially hypoperfused and hyperperfused lesions, respectively. On dedicated liver MRI or CT at 3 months after Y-90, the complete response rates were 5.6% and 16.5% in the hypoperfused and hyperperfused cohort, respectively (P = 0.60). When controlling for various clinical features, including tumor histology, patients with arterially hypoperfused tumors had significantly shorter progression-free survival (HR 1.87, 95% CI - 1.03 - 3.37, P = 0.039) and greater elsewhere liver (HR 3.36, 95% CI = 1.23 - 9.20, P = 0.019) and distant failure (HR 7.64 (2.71 - 21.54, P < 0.001). In inverse probability weighted analysis, patients with arterially hypoperfused tumors had worse overall survival (P = 0.032). In the quantitative analysis, lower levels of lesion perfusion were also associated with worse clinical outcomes, again controlling for tumor histology. Conclusion: Compared to arterially hyperperfused tumors, hypoperfused primary liver tumors treated with Y-90 may have worse clinical outcomes.
KW - Y-90
KW - cholangiocarcinoma
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - hypoperfusion
KW - intra-arterial therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201525908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2024.1433480
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2024.1433480
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201525908
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 1433480
ER -