Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are additives unnatural? Generality and mechanisms of additivity dominance

  • Sydney E. Scott
  • , Paul Rozin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Naturalness is important and valued by most lay Western individuals. Yet, little is known about the lay meaning of “natural”. We examine the phenomenon of additivity dominance: adding something to a natural product (additive) reduces naturalness more than removing an equivalent entity (“subtractive”). We demonstrate additivity dominance for the first time using equivalent adding and subtracting procedures. We find that adding something reduces naturalness more than removing the same thing (e.g., adding pulp to orange juice reduces naturalness more than removing pulp from orange juice; Study 1); an organism with a gene added is less natural than one with a gene removed (Study 2); and framing a product as an additive (versus as a subtractive) reduces naturalness (Study 3). We begin to examine accounts of additivity dominance. We find that it is not due to the connotations of the word “additive” (Study 4). However, data are consistent with an extra processing account -where additives involve more processing (extracting and adding) than subtractives (only removing)-and with a contagion account - where adding is more contaminating than removing (Study 5).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)572-583
    Number of pages12
    JournalJudgment and Decision Making
    Volume12
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2017

    Keywords

    • Additive
    • Additivity dominance
    • Contagion
    • Natural
    • Process

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are additives unnatural? Generality and mechanisms of additivity dominance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this