Appropriate selection of participants in pediatric developmental and epileptic encephalopathy trials: Lessons learned and future opportunities

Dennis Dlugos, Meryl Lozano, Bree DiVentura, Gail Farfel, Renée A. Shellhaas, Joseph E. Sullivan, Liu Lin Thio, Sudha Kilaru Kessler, Lynette G. Sadleir, Jacqueline French

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We evaluate the impact of independent, central review of epilepsy syndromes and seizure classification in randomized controlled treatment trials of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS). Central review of two recent trials determined that 5.6% of enrolled DS participants and 3.4% of enrolled LGS participants pending randomization did not meet criteria for the epilepsy syndrome under study. Furthermore, 23% of DS participants and 32% of LGS participants had at least one seizure reclassified; 63.8% of DS sites and 78% of LGS sites had at least one participant with a seizure reclassification. Independent, central review of participants in pediatric ASM trials improves consistency across study sites, as well as overall accuracy of syndromic diagnosis and seizure classification, and may reduce placebo response rate.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEpilepsia
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
  • Dravet syndrome
  • fenfluramine
  • Lennox–Gastaut syndrome
  • randomized control trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Appropriate selection of participants in pediatric developmental and epileptic encephalopathy trials: Lessons learned and future opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this