Application of a Framework to Assess the Usefulness of Alternative Sepsis Criteria

Christopher W. Seymour, Craig M. Coopersmith, Clifford S. Deutschman, Foster Gesten, Michael Klompas, Mitchell Levy, Gregory S. Martin, Tiffany M. Osborn, Chanu Rhee, David K. Warren, R. Scott Watson, Derek C. Angus

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations


The current definition of sepsis is life-threatening, acute organ dysfunction secondary to a dysregulated host response to infection. Criteria to operationalize this definition can be judged by six domains of usefulness (reliability, content, construct and criterion validity, measurement burden, and timeliness). The relative importance of these six domains depends on the intended purpose for the criteria (clinical care, basic and clinical research, surveillance, or quality improvement [QI] and audit). For example, criteria for clinical care should have high content and construct validity, timeliness, and low measurement burden to facilitate prompt care. Criteria for surveillance or QI/audit place greater emphasis on reliability across individuals and sites and lower emphasis on timeliness. Criteria for clinical trials require timeliness to ensure prompt enrollment and reasonable reliability but can tolerate high measurement burden. Basic research also tolerates high measurement burden and may not need stability over time. In an illustrative case study, we compared examples of criteria designed for clinical care, surveillance and QI/audit among 396,241 patients admitted to 12 academic and community hospitals in an integrated health system. Case rates differed four-fold and mortality three-fold. Predictably, clinical care criteria, which emphasized timeliness and low burden and therefore used vital signs and routine laboratory tests, had the greater case identification with lowest mortality. QI/audit criteria, which emphasized reliability and criterion validity, used discharge information and had the lowest case identification with highest mortality. Using this framework to identify the purpose and apply domains of usefulness can help with the evaluation of existing sepsis diagnostic criteria and provide a roadmap for future work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e122-e130
JournalCritical care medicine
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016


  • Definitions
  • diagnosis
  • diagnostic criteria
  • measurement
  • reliability
  • sepsis
  • validity


Dive into the research topics of 'Application of a Framework to Assess the Usefulness of Alternative Sepsis Criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this