TY - JOUR
T1 - Antidepressant Augmentation versus Switch in Treatment-Resistant Geriatric Depression
AU - Lenze, Eric J.
AU - Mulsant, Benoit H.
AU - Roose, Steven P.
AU - Lavretsky, Helen
AU - Reynolds, Charles F.
AU - Blumberger, Daniel M.
AU - Brown, Patrick J.
AU - Cristancho, Pilar
AU - Flint, Alastair J.
AU - Gebara, Marie A.
AU - Gettinger, Torie R.
AU - Lenard, Emily
AU - Miller, J. Philip
AU - Nicol, Ginger E.
AU - Oughli, Hanadi A.
AU - Pham, Vy T.
AU - Rollman, Bruce L.
AU - Yang, Lei
AU - Karp, Jordan F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ( PCORI ) Award (TRD-1511-33321). No in-kind support was received. Dr. Lenze received additional support from the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research at Washington University School of Medicine, as well as the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant (UL1TR002345) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Mulsant received additional support from the Labatt Family Chair in Biology of Depression in Late-Life Adults at the University of Toronto. Dr. Lavretsky received support from grants (K24 AT009198, R01 AT008383, and R01 MH114981) from the NIH. Dr. Brown received additional support from the National Institute of Mental Health OPTIMUM NEURO grant (5R01MH114980).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The benefits and risks of augmenting or switching antidepressants in older adults with treatment-resistant depression have not been extensively studied. Methods: We conducted a two-step, open-label trial involving adults 60 years of age or older with treatment-resistant depression. In step 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to augmentation of existing antidepressant medication with aripiprazole, augmentation with bupropion, or a switch from existing antidepressant medication to bupropion. Patients who did not benefit from or were ineligible for step 1 were randomly assigned in step 2 in a 1:1 ratio to augmentation with lithium or a switch to nortriptyline. Each step lasted approximately 10 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in psychological well-being, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Positive Affect and General Life Satisfaction subscales (population mean, 50; higher scores indicate greater well-being). A secondary outcome was remission of depression. Results: In step 1, a total of 619 patients were enrolled; 211 were assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, 206 to bupropion augmentation, and 202 to a switch to bupropion. Well-being scores improved by 4.83 points, 4.33 points, and 2.04 points, respectively. The difference between the aripiprazole-augmentation group and the switch-to-bupropion group was 2.79 points (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.02; P=0.014, with a prespecified threshold P value of 0.017); the between-group differences were not significant for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation or for bupropion augmentation versus a switch to bupropion. Remission occurred in 28.9% of patients in the aripiprazole-augmentation group, 28.2% in the bupropion-augmentation group, and 19.3% in the switch-to-bupropion group. The rate of falls was highest with bupropion augmentation. In step 2, a total of 248 patients were enrolled; 127 were assigned to lithium augmentation and 121 to a switch to nortriptyline. Well-being scores improved by 3.17 points and 2.18 points, respectively (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.91). Remission occurred in 18.9% of patients in the lithium-augmentation group and 21.5% in the switch-to-nortriptyline group; rates of falling were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In older adults with treatment-resistant depression, augmentation of existing antidepressants with aripiprazole improved well-being significantly more over 10 weeks than a switch to bupropion and was associated with a numerically higher incidence of remission. Among patients in whom augmentation or a switch to bupropion failed, changes in well-being and the occurrence of remission with lithium augmentation or a switch to nortriptyline were similar.
AB - Background: The benefits and risks of augmenting or switching antidepressants in older adults with treatment-resistant depression have not been extensively studied. Methods: We conducted a two-step, open-label trial involving adults 60 years of age or older with treatment-resistant depression. In step 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to augmentation of existing antidepressant medication with aripiprazole, augmentation with bupropion, or a switch from existing antidepressant medication to bupropion. Patients who did not benefit from or were ineligible for step 1 were randomly assigned in step 2 in a 1:1 ratio to augmentation with lithium or a switch to nortriptyline. Each step lasted approximately 10 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in psychological well-being, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Positive Affect and General Life Satisfaction subscales (population mean, 50; higher scores indicate greater well-being). A secondary outcome was remission of depression. Results: In step 1, a total of 619 patients were enrolled; 211 were assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, 206 to bupropion augmentation, and 202 to a switch to bupropion. Well-being scores improved by 4.83 points, 4.33 points, and 2.04 points, respectively. The difference between the aripiprazole-augmentation group and the switch-to-bupropion group was 2.79 points (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.02; P=0.014, with a prespecified threshold P value of 0.017); the between-group differences were not significant for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation or for bupropion augmentation versus a switch to bupropion. Remission occurred in 28.9% of patients in the aripiprazole-augmentation group, 28.2% in the bupropion-augmentation group, and 19.3% in the switch-to-bupropion group. The rate of falls was highest with bupropion augmentation. In step 2, a total of 248 patients were enrolled; 127 were assigned to lithium augmentation and 121 to a switch to nortriptyline. Well-being scores improved by 3.17 points and 2.18 points, respectively (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.91). Remission occurred in 18.9% of patients in the lithium-augmentation group and 21.5% in the switch-to-nortriptyline group; rates of falling were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In older adults with treatment-resistant depression, augmentation of existing antidepressants with aripiprazole improved well-being significantly more over 10 weeks than a switch to bupropion and was associated with a numerically higher incidence of remission. Among patients in whom augmentation or a switch to bupropion failed, changes in well-being and the occurrence of remission with lithium augmentation or a switch to nortriptyline were similar.
KW - Clinical Medicine
KW - Clinical Medicine General
KW - Depression
KW - Geriatrics/Aging
KW - Geriatrics/Aging General
KW - Neurology/Neurosurgery
KW - Neurology/Neurosurgery General
KW - Psychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151042872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2204462
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2204462
M3 - Article
C2 - 36867173
AN - SCOPUS:85151042872
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 388
SP - 1067
EP - 1079
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 12
ER -