Anti-Ageism for Gerontologists

  • Nancy Morrow-Howell
  • , Suzanne Kunkel
  • , Tracey Gendron
  • , Shannon E. Jarrott
  • , Carrie Andreoletti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We argue that gerontologists are products of our ageist culture and that we both perpetuate ageism and suffer from internalized ageism ourselves. We make ageist comments, deny our own age, fail to teach students to recognize and confront ageism, and use language that otherizes and categorizes older people. Gerontologists are in ideal positions to confront ageism through our scholarly work, teaching, and community engagement. However, we suggest that, despite our deep gerontological knowledge, we do not have enough awareness, knowledge, and skills for taking anti-ageism actions in these arenas of our professional lives. We offer some suggestions for confronting ageism, including self-study, increasing content on ageism in the classroom and beyond, pointing out ageist language and behaviors to colleagues and students, working with diversity, equity and inclusion offices on campus, and giving careful consideration to our research approaches and academic writing. To go forward, we must increase awareness about ageism and gain skills in promoting anti-ageism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-731
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Aging and Social Policy
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Age discrimination
  • age stereotype
  • internalized ageism
  • reframing aging
  • structural ageism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-Ageism for Gerontologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this