Anomaly detection in electronic voting systems

Juan E. Gilbert, Jerone Dunbar, Alvitta Ottley, John Mark Smotherman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studies have shown that voting error remains a problem with Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines. DRE's have an advantage over other voting technologies by facilitating ballot verification through review screens. However, results from ballot verification studies have shown that no more than half of study participants notice review screen anomalies (Campbell & Byrne, 2009). This research replicated previous studies on anomaly detection on review screens using a multimodal voting system called Prime III. The results suggest that Prime III facilitates ballot verification and effectively yielded a detection rate of 90%, even without informing participants on the importance of ballot verification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-206
Number of pages13
JournalInformation Design Journal
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • DRE
  • Electronic voting anomalies
  • Information interfaces and presentation
  • Prime III
  • User interfaces
  • VoteBox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anomaly detection in electronic voting systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this