TY - JOUR
T1 - Anomaly detection in electronic voting systems
AU - Gilbert, Juan E.
AU - Dunbar, Jerone
AU - Ottley, Alvitta
AU - Smotherman, John Mark
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Studies have shown that voting error remains a problem with Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines. DRE's have an advantage over other voting technologies by facilitating ballot verification through review screens. However, results from ballot verification studies have shown that no more than half of study participants notice review screen anomalies (Campbell & Byrne, 2009). This research replicated previous studies on anomaly detection on review screens using a multimodal voting system called Prime III. The results suggest that Prime III facilitates ballot verification and effectively yielded a detection rate of 90%, even without informing participants on the importance of ballot verification.
AB - Studies have shown that voting error remains a problem with Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines. DRE's have an advantage over other voting technologies by facilitating ballot verification through review screens. However, results from ballot verification studies have shown that no more than half of study participants notice review screen anomalies (Campbell & Byrne, 2009). This research replicated previous studies on anomaly detection on review screens using a multimodal voting system called Prime III. The results suggest that Prime III facilitates ballot verification and effectively yielded a detection rate of 90%, even without informing participants on the importance of ballot verification.
KW - DRE
KW - Electronic voting anomalies
KW - Information interfaces and presentation
KW - Prime III
KW - User interfaces
KW - VoteBox
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907357606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1075/idj.20.3.01gil
DO - 10.1075/idj.20.3.01gil
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84907357606
SN - 0142-5471
VL - 20
SP - 194
EP - 206
JO - Information Design Journal
JF - Information Design Journal
IS - 3
ER -