Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index

Michael S. Avidan, Lini Zhang, Beth A. Burnside, Kevin J. Finkel, Adam C. Searleman, Jacqueline A. Selvidge, Leif Saager, Michelle S. Turner, Srikar Rao, Michael Bottros, Charles Hantler, Eric Jacobsohn, Alex S. Evers, Jane Cueto, Dusica Stamenkovic, Elika Safarzadeh, Furqaan Sadiq, Barry Hong, Heiko Kaiser, Laura VeremakisBrian Torres, Katy Dustman, Jeanine Riddle, Michael Rybak, Dia Tite, Nicholas Girdner, Bernadette Henrichs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

697 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Awareness during anesthesia is a serious complication with potential long-term psychological consequences. Use of the bispectral index (BIS), developed from a processed electroencephalogram, has been reported to decrease the incidence of anesthesia awareness when the BIS value is maintained below 60. In this trial, we sought to determine whether a BIS-based protocol is better than a protocol based on a measurement of end-tidal anesthetic gas (ETAG) for decreasing anesthesia awareness in patients at high risk for this complication. Methods: We randomly assigned 2000 patients to BIS-guided anesthesia (target BIS range, 40 to 60) or ETAG-guided anesthesia (target ETAG range, 0.7 to 1.3 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]). Postoperatively, patients were assessed for anesthesia awareness at three intervals (0 to 24 hours, 24 to 72 hours, and 30 days after extubation). Results: We assessed 967 and 974 patients from the BIS and ETAG groups, respectively. Two cases of definite anesthesia awareness occurred in each group (absolute difference, 0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?0.56 to 0.57%). The BIS value was greater than 60 in one case of definite anesthesia awareness, and the ETAG concentrations were less than 0.7 MAC in three cases. For all patients, the mean (±SD) time-averaged ETAG concentration was 0.81±0.25 MAC in the BIS group and 0.827±0.23 MAC in the ETAG group (P=0.10; 95% CI for the difference between the BIS and ETAG groups, ?0.04 to 0.01 MAC). Conclusions: We did not reproduce the results of previous studies that reported a lower incidence of anesthesia awareness with BIS monitoring, and the use of the BIS protocol was not associated with reduced administration of volatile anesthetic gases. Anesthesia awareness occurred even when BIS values and ETAG concentrations were within the target ranges. Our findings do not support routine BIS monitoring as part of standard practice. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00281489.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1097-1108
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume358
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this