Anatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods

  • Alejandro Omar Blenkmann
  • , Sabine Liliana Leske
  • , Anaïs Llorens
  • , Jack J. Lin
  • , Edward F. Chang
  • , Peter Brunner
  • , Gerwin Schalk
  • , Jugoslav Ivanovic
  • , Pål Gunnar Larsson
  • , Robert Thomas Knight
  • , Tor Endestad
  • , Anne Kristin Solbakk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations. New methods: We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes’ CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints. Results: We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (<1 mm errors). Validation with data from 20 challenging patients showed 99% accurate localization of the electrodes (3160/3192). We tested CEPA brain-shift compensation with data from 15 patients. Projections accounted for simple mechanical deformation principles with < 0.4 mm errors. The inter-electrode distances smoothly changed across neighbor electrodes, while changes in inter-electrode distances linearly increased with projection distance. Comparison with existing methods: GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA. Conclusion: GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110056
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume404
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Depth electrodes
  • EEG (iEEG)
  • Electrocorticography (ECoG)
  • Intracranial
  • Simulations
  • Stereo electroencephalography (SEEG)
  • Subcortical grids
  • Subdural grids

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this