TY - JOUR
T1 - Anatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods
AU - Blenkmann, Alejandro Omar
AU - Leske, Sabine Liliana
AU - Llorens, Anaïs
AU - Lin, Jack J.
AU - Chang, Edward F.
AU - Brunner, Peter
AU - Schalk, Gerwin
AU - Ivanovic, Jugoslav
AU - Larsson, Pål Gunnar
AU - Knight, Robert Thomas
AU - Endestad, Tor
AU - Solbakk, Anne Kristin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations. New methods: We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes’ CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints. Results: We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (<1 mm errors). Validation with data from 20 challenging patients showed 99% accurate localization of the electrodes (3160/3192). We tested CEPA brain-shift compensation with data from 15 patients. Projections accounted for simple mechanical deformation principles with < 0.4 mm errors. The inter-electrode distances smoothly changed across neighbor electrodes, while changes in inter-electrode distances linearly increased with projection distance. Comparison with existing methods: GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA. Conclusion: GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.
AB - Background: Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations. New methods: We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes’ CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints. Results: We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (<1 mm errors). Validation with data from 20 challenging patients showed 99% accurate localization of the electrodes (3160/3192). We tested CEPA brain-shift compensation with data from 15 patients. Projections accounted for simple mechanical deformation principles with < 0.4 mm errors. The inter-electrode distances smoothly changed across neighbor electrodes, while changes in inter-electrode distances linearly increased with projection distance. Comparison with existing methods: GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA. Conclusion: GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.
KW - Depth electrodes
KW - EEG (iEEG)
KW - Electrocorticography (ECoG)
KW - Intracranial
KW - Simulations
KW - Stereo electroencephalography (SEEG)
KW - Subcortical grids
KW - Subdural grids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183984368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110056
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110056
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38224783
AN - SCOPUS:85183984368
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 404
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
M1 - 110056
ER -