TY - JOUR
T1 - An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an extraction-less "direct" RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples
AU - Mills, Margaret G.
AU - Bruce, Emily
AU - Huang, Meei Li
AU - Crothers, Jessica W.
AU - Hyrien, Ollivier
AU - Oura, Christopher A.L.
AU - Blake, Lemar
AU - Jordan, Arianne Brown
AU - Hester, Susan
AU - Wehmas, Leah
AU - Mari, Bernard
AU - Barby, Pascal
AU - Lacoux, Caroline
AU - Fassy, Julien
AU - Vial, Pablo
AU - Vial, Cecilia
AU - Martinez, Jose R.W.
AU - Oladipo, Olusola Olalekan
AU - Inuwa, Bitrus
AU - Shittu, Ismaila
AU - Meseko, Clement A.
AU - Chammas, Roger
AU - Santos, Carlos Ferreira
AU - Dionísio, Thiago José
AU - Garbieri, Thais Francini
AU - Parisi, Viviane Aparecida
AU - Mendes-Correa, Maria Cassia
AU - de Paula, Anderson V.
AU - Romano, Camila M.
AU - Góes, Luiz Gustavo Bentim
AU - Minoprio, Paola
AU - Campos, Angelica C.
AU - Cunha, Marielton P.
AU - Vilela, Ana Paula P.
AU - Nyirenda, Tonney
AU - Mkakosya, Rajhab Sawasawa
AU - Muula, Adamson S.
AU - Dumm, Rebekah E.
AU - Harris, Rebecca M.
AU - Mitchell, Constance A.
AU - Pettit, Syril
AU - Botten, Jason
AU - Jerome, Keith R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is used worldwide to test and trace the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV- 2). "Extraction-less"or "direct"real time-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a transparent and accessible qualitative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal or oral pharyngeal samples with the potential to generate actionable data more quickly, at a lower cost, and with fewer experimental resources than full RT-qPCR. This study engaged 10 global testing sites, including laboratories currently experiencing testing limitations due to reagent or equipment shortages, in an international interlaboratory ring trial. Participating laboratories were provided a common protocol, common reagents, aliquots of identical pooled clinical samples, and purified nucleic acids and used their existing in-house equipment. We observed 100% concordance across laboratories in the correct identification of all positive and negative samples, with highly similar cycle threshold values. The test also performed well when applied to locally collected patient nasopharyngeal samples, provided the viral transport media did not contain charcoal or guanidine, both of which appeared to potently inhibit the RT-PCR reaction. Our results suggest that direct RT-PCR assay methods can be clearly translated across sites utilizing readily available equipment and expertise and are thus a feasible option for more efficient COVID- 19 coronavirus disease testing as demanded by the continuing pandemic.
AB - Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is used worldwide to test and trace the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV- 2). "Extraction-less"or "direct"real time-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a transparent and accessible qualitative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal or oral pharyngeal samples with the potential to generate actionable data more quickly, at a lower cost, and with fewer experimental resources than full RT-qPCR. This study engaged 10 global testing sites, including laboratories currently experiencing testing limitations due to reagent or equipment shortages, in an international interlaboratory ring trial. Participating laboratories were provided a common protocol, common reagents, aliquots of identical pooled clinical samples, and purified nucleic acids and used their existing in-house equipment. We observed 100% concordance across laboratories in the correct identification of all positive and negative samples, with highly similar cycle threshold values. The test also performed well when applied to locally collected patient nasopharyngeal samples, provided the viral transport media did not contain charcoal or guanidine, both of which appeared to potently inhibit the RT-PCR reaction. Our results suggest that direct RT-PCR assay methods can be clearly translated across sites utilizing readily available equipment and expertise and are thus a feasible option for more efficient COVID- 19 coronavirus disease testing as demanded by the continuing pandemic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122893792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0261853
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0261853
M3 - Article
C2 - 35025926
AN - SCOPUS:85122893792
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0261853
ER -