TY - JOUR
T1 - An examination of orthographic and phonological processing using the task-choice procedure
AU - Kahan, Todd A.
AU - Hengen, Keith B.
AU - Mathis, Katherine M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to Todd A. Kahan, Department of Psychology, Bates College, 4 Andrews Road, Lewiston, ME, USA. E-mail: [email protected] This work was generously supported by a Charles F. and Evelyn M. Phillips Faculty Fellowship from Bates College awarded to the first author. We are grateful to Jim Enns for allowing us to collect data in his laboratory at the University of British Columbia.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - The task-choice procedure provides a way for assessing whether stimuli are processed immediately upon presentation and in parallel with other cognitive operations. In this procedure, the task changes on a trial-by-trial basis and the cue informing participants about the task appears either before or simultaneously with the target, which is either degraded or clear. Of interest is whether the effect of stimulus clarity will disappear when the cue is presented simultaneously with the target, suggesting capacity-free processing, or whether the effect of stimulus clarity will remain, suggesting target processing is delayed. Besner and Care developed this procedure using nonword targets and found that phonological information was not extracted in parallel with deciphering the task cue. The current experiment examined whether phonological and orthographic information could be extracted from word and nonword stimuli in a capacity-free manner. Results indicate that in both tasks some processing does occur in a capacity-free manner when words are used but not when nonwords are used. These data may be consistent with interactive activation models which posit top-down lexical connections that facilitate the extraction of sublexical codes.
AB - The task-choice procedure provides a way for assessing whether stimuli are processed immediately upon presentation and in parallel with other cognitive operations. In this procedure, the task changes on a trial-by-trial basis and the cue informing participants about the task appears either before or simultaneously with the target, which is either degraded or clear. Of interest is whether the effect of stimulus clarity will disappear when the cue is presented simultaneously with the target, suggesting capacity-free processing, or whether the effect of stimulus clarity will remain, suggesting target processing is delayed. Besner and Care developed this procedure using nonword targets and found that phonological information was not extracted in parallel with deciphering the task cue. The current experiment examined whether phonological and orthographic information could be extracted from word and nonword stimuli in a capacity-free manner. Results indicate that in both tasks some processing does occur in a capacity-free manner when words are used but not when nonwords are used. These data may be consistent with interactive activation models which posit top-down lexical connections that facilitate the extraction of sublexical codes.
KW - Automaticity
KW - Orthography
KW - Phonology
KW - Word recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751682733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01690961003752355
DO - 10.1080/01690961003752355
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78751682733
SN - 0169-0965
VL - 26
SP - 171
EP - 190
JO - Language and Cognitive Processes
JF - Language and Cognitive Processes
IS - 2
ER -