TY - JOUR
T1 - An evidence synthesis on perioperative Handoffs
T2 - A call for balanced sociotechnical solutions
AU - Abraham, Joanna
AU - Duffy, Caoimhe
AU - Kandasamy, Madhumitha
AU - France, Dan
AU - Greilich, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge Ms. Michelle Doering (medical librarian) for her assistance with conducting our initial search, Ms. Tara Suresh (medical student) for her help with initial pilot data extraction and quality assessment, and Ms. Kelley Foyil for her scientific proof-reading and review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Significance: Perioperative handoffs interconnect the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases underlying surgical care to maintain care continuity —yet are prone to coordination and communication failures. Objective: To synthesize evidence on factors affecting the safety and quality of perioperative handoff conduct and process. Materials and Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted to include observational, descriptive studies of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative handoffs published in English language, peer-reviewed journals. Data analysis was informed by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework describing the relationship between the work-system, work processes, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Scoring System. Results: Twenty-three studies were included. Eighteen studies focused on postoperative handoffs, with one on preoperative, three on intraoperative and only one that looked at preoperative/postoperative handoffs combined. The SEIPS framework elucidated the complex inter-related factors (enablers and barriers) related to perioperative handoff safety. While some studies found that the use of standardized handoff tools and protocols and interdisciplinary teamwork were frequently-reported enablers, other studies identified the lack of structured handoff tools and protocols, poor teamwork and communication, and improper use of documentation tools were top-cited barriers affecting handoff quality. Suggestions to ensure handoff safety and quality included implementing structured handoff checklists and protocols and building interprofessional teamwork competencies for effective communication. Discussion and Conclusion: Our review highlights an urgency to develop more holistic sociotechnical solutions that can create and sustain a balance between technical innovations in tools and technologies and the non-technical interventions/training needed to improve interpersonal relations and teamwork competencies – taken together, can improve the quality and safety of perioperative handoff practice.
AB - Significance: Perioperative handoffs interconnect the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases underlying surgical care to maintain care continuity —yet are prone to coordination and communication failures. Objective: To synthesize evidence on factors affecting the safety and quality of perioperative handoff conduct and process. Materials and Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted to include observational, descriptive studies of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative handoffs published in English language, peer-reviewed journals. Data analysis was informed by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework describing the relationship between the work-system, work processes, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Scoring System. Results: Twenty-three studies were included. Eighteen studies focused on postoperative handoffs, with one on preoperative, three on intraoperative and only one that looked at preoperative/postoperative handoffs combined. The SEIPS framework elucidated the complex inter-related factors (enablers and barriers) related to perioperative handoff safety. While some studies found that the use of standardized handoff tools and protocols and interdisciplinary teamwork were frequently-reported enablers, other studies identified the lack of structured handoff tools and protocols, poor teamwork and communication, and improper use of documentation tools were top-cited barriers affecting handoff quality. Suggestions to ensure handoff safety and quality included implementing structured handoff checklists and protocols and building interprofessional teamwork competencies for effective communication. Discussion and Conclusion: Our review highlights an urgency to develop more holistic sociotechnical solutions that can create and sustain a balance between technical innovations in tools and technologies and the non-technical interventions/training needed to improve interpersonal relations and teamwork competencies – taken together, can improve the quality and safety of perioperative handoff practice.
KW - Anesthesia
KW - Handoff
KW - Handover
KW - Surgery
KW - Systematic Review
KW - Transitions in Care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150452599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105038
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105038
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36948060
AN - SCOPUS:85150452599
SN - 1386-5056
VL - 174
JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics
JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics
M1 - 105038
ER -