TY - JOUR
T1 - American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Appropriate Use Criteria
T2 - Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Major Extremity Trauma
AU - Strelzow, Jason
AU - Tedesco, Nicholas S.
AU - Renninger, Christopher H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
PY - 2023/1/15
Y1 - 2023/1/15
N2 - The Major Extremity Trauma and Rehabilitation Consortium and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons have developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) After Major Extremity Trauma. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to determine appropriateness of various treatments for the prevention of SSIs after major extremity trauma. Scenarios were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients suspected of developing an SSI in clinical practice. Indications are most often parameters observable by the clinician, including symptoms or results of diagnostic tests. A total of 588 patient scenarios and 14 treatments were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this Appropriate Use Criteria topic. Next, a separate, multidisciplinary voting panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as “appropriate” (median rating, 7 to 9), “may be appropriate” (median rating, 4 to 6), or “rarely appropriate” (median rating, 1 to 3).
AB - The Major Extremity Trauma and Rehabilitation Consortium and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons have developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) After Major Extremity Trauma. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to determine appropriateness of various treatments for the prevention of SSIs after major extremity trauma. Scenarios were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients suspected of developing an SSI in clinical practice. Indications are most often parameters observable by the clinician, including symptoms or results of diagnostic tests. A total of 588 patient scenarios and 14 treatments were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this Appropriate Use Criteria topic. Next, a separate, multidisciplinary voting panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as “appropriate” (median rating, 7 to 9), “may be appropriate” (median rating, 4 to 6), or “rarely appropriate” (median rating, 1 to 3).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145242432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00868
DO - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00868
M3 - Article
C2 - 36580048
AN - SCOPUS:85145242432
SN - 1067-151X
VL - 31
SP - E68-E72
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
IS - 2
ER -