TY - JOUR
T1 - Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium
AU - Raji, Cyrus A.
AU - Meysami, Somayeh
AU - Lee, Soojin
AU - Garg, Saurabh
AU - Akbari, Nasrin
AU - Pompa, Rodrigo Solis
AU - Gouda, Ahmed
AU - Nguyen, Thanh Duc
AU - Basar, Saqib
AU - Chodakiewitz, Yosef Gavriel
AU - Merrill, David A.
AU - Patel, Amar
AU - Durand, Daniel J.
AU - Hashemi, Sam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Brain age predicted from structural brain images on T1 weighted scans can lend insight to Alzheimer's risk factors such as muscle loss with sarcopenia. We thus investigated the link between body MRI measured muscle mass, muscle to fat ratio and brain age. METHOD: In all, 1,164 healthy participants from four sites (mean chronological age 55.17 ± 12.37 years, 52% women; 48% men; 39% non-white) were scanned on 1.5T MR machines with a whole-body protocol. Whole body sequences utilized in the quantitative analyses of muscle mass were coronal T1 were used to segment total muscle volume normalized to participant height, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT). In this process, a nnU-Net model was used for fully supervised segmentation and ITK-SNAP was used for manual annotation. Brain age was computed from T1 MPRAGE scans using a regression-based 3D Simple Fully Convolutional Network. The model was trained on in-house T1-weighted MRI scans collected from 5,500 healthy individuals, aged 18 to 89 years. Brain age gap (BAG) was calculated by subtracting chronological age from brain age. Bivariate correlations between total normalized muscle volume (TNMV) as well as VAT and SAT normalized to total muscle volume to chronological and brain age were done with partial correlations adjusted for sex with brain age analyses. RESULT: Mean brain age was higher than chronological age (56.04 ± 12.65, mean BAG = 0.69). Higher TNMV was related to both decreased chronological age (rp=-0.2579, p = 2.524e-17) and brain age (rp =-0.2497, p = 2.65e-16). VAT normalized to total muscle volume was linked to higher chronological (rp=0.3755, p = 2.615e-36) and brain age (rp=0.3797, p = 3.871e-37) adjusting for sex. No statistically significant links were noted with TNMV, VAT, SAT or and BAG. SAT was also not correlated in a statistically significant way to chronological or brain age. CONCLUSION: Increasing muscle mass is related to lower chronological and brain age while visceral fat normalized to muscle volume is related to increased chronological and brain age. Lack of correlation to BAG may be due to the relatively low BAG in this sample. This work suggests improving muscle mass and reducing visceral fat may improve brain aging.
AB - BACKGROUND: Brain age predicted from structural brain images on T1 weighted scans can lend insight to Alzheimer's risk factors such as muscle loss with sarcopenia. We thus investigated the link between body MRI measured muscle mass, muscle to fat ratio and brain age. METHOD: In all, 1,164 healthy participants from four sites (mean chronological age 55.17 ± 12.37 years, 52% women; 48% men; 39% non-white) were scanned on 1.5T MR machines with a whole-body protocol. Whole body sequences utilized in the quantitative analyses of muscle mass were coronal T1 were used to segment total muscle volume normalized to participant height, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT). In this process, a nnU-Net model was used for fully supervised segmentation and ITK-SNAP was used for manual annotation. Brain age was computed from T1 MPRAGE scans using a regression-based 3D Simple Fully Convolutional Network. The model was trained on in-house T1-weighted MRI scans collected from 5,500 healthy individuals, aged 18 to 89 years. Brain age gap (BAG) was calculated by subtracting chronological age from brain age. Bivariate correlations between total normalized muscle volume (TNMV) as well as VAT and SAT normalized to total muscle volume to chronological and brain age were done with partial correlations adjusted for sex with brain age analyses. RESULT: Mean brain age was higher than chronological age (56.04 ± 12.65, mean BAG = 0.69). Higher TNMV was related to both decreased chronological age (rp=-0.2579, p = 2.524e-17) and brain age (rp =-0.2497, p = 2.65e-16). VAT normalized to total muscle volume was linked to higher chronological (rp=0.3755, p = 2.615e-36) and brain age (rp=0.3797, p = 3.871e-37) adjusting for sex. No statistically significant links were noted with TNMV, VAT, SAT or and BAG. SAT was also not correlated in a statistically significant way to chronological or brain age. CONCLUSION: Increasing muscle mass is related to lower chronological and brain age while visceral fat normalized to muscle volume is related to increased chronological and brain age. Lack of correlation to BAG may be due to the relatively low BAG in this sample. This work suggests improving muscle mass and reducing visceral fat may improve brain aging.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025739209
U2 - 10.1002/alz70862_110051
DO - 10.1002/alz70862_110051
M3 - Article
C2 - 41433449
AN - SCOPUS:105025739209
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 21
SP - e110051
JO - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
JF - Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
ER -