Alterations in circulating vitamin D metabolites in the young insulin-dependent diabetic

Teresa E. Frazer, Neil H. White, Stephen Hough, Julio V. Santiago, Bonnie R. McGee, Grahm Bryce, John Mallon, Louis V. Avioli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

To assess the relationship between the decreased bone mass observed in young insulin-requiring diabetic patients and vitamin D metabolism, we measured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 24, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentration in 45 white, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects, 7-18 yr of age. Metacarpal cortical thickness in 87% of these diabetics was below the mean for their respective ages, while 16% had a cortical thickness value greater than 2 SDS below the mean. Serum calcium and phosphate concentrations were normal, immunoreactive parathyroid hormone was in the low normal range, and total serum alkaline phosphatase was elevated compared to age-and sex-matched controls. Circulating 24, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations were significantly elevated, and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D was significantly decreased. The increase in 24, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D was greater in the diabetics with the most severe bone loss and was maximally increased during the first 5 yr of clinical diabetes. No apparent correlation was seen between metabolic control, as measured by hemoglobin A1C and urine and plasma glucose, and the circulating levels of the vitamin D metabolites. Despite appropriate insulin replacement, alterations in vitamin D metabolism occur in the young insulin-dependent diabetic and could relate to the decrease in cortical bone mass observed in these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1154-1159
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1981

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alterations in circulating vitamin D metabolites in the young insulin-dependent diabetic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this