TY - JOUR
T1 - Allogeneic transplantation for advanced acute myeloid leukemia
T2 - The value of complete remission
AU - Weisdorf, Daniel J.
AU - Millard, Heather R.
AU - Horowitz, Mary M.
AU - Hyare, Parvinder S.
AU - Champlin, Richard
AU - Ho, Vincent
AU - Mielcarek, Marco
AU - Rezvani, Andrew
AU - Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
AU - Khoury, Hanna J.
AU - De Lima, Marcos
AU - Saber, Wael
AU - Sandmaier, Brenda
AU - Zhang, Mei Jie
AU - Eapen, Mary
N1 - Funding Information:
Daniel Weisdorf and the CIBMTR report grants from Sunesis Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Alexion and personal fees from Kadmon and Enlivex outside the submitted work. Parvinder S. Hyare is an employee of Sunesis Pharmaceuticals. This study was performed at the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation with partial financial support from Sunesis Pharmaceuticals. The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation (CIBMTR) is supported by Public Health Service grant/cooperative agreement 5U24-CA076518 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); grant/cooperative agreement 5U10HL069294 from the NHLBI and the NCI; contract HHSH250201200016C with the Health Resources and Services Administration/Department of Health and Human Services; 2 grants (N00014-15-1-0848 and N00014-16-1-2020) from the Office of Naval Research; grants from Alexion; Amgen, Inc. (corporate member); an anonymous donation to the Medical College of Wisconsin; Astellas Pharma US; AstraZeneca; Be the Match Foundation; Bluebird Bio, Inc. (corporate member); Bristol Myers Squibb Oncology (corporate member); Celgene Corporation (corporate member); Cellular Dynamics International, Inc.; Chimerix, Inc. (corporate member); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Gamida Cell Ltd.; Genentech, Inc.; Genzyme Corporation; Gilead Sciences, Inc. (corporate member); Health Research, Inc.; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; HistoGenetics, Inc.; Incyte Corporation; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (corporate member); Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation; The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society; Medac, GmbH; MedImmune; The Medical College of Wisconsin; Merck & Company, Inc. (corporate member); Mesoblast; MesoScale Diagnostics, Inc.; Miltenyi Biotec, Inc. (corporate member); National Marrow Donor Program; Neovii Biotech NA, Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Onyx Pharmaceuticals; Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.-Japan; PCORI; Perkin Elmer, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc; Sanofi US (corporate member); Seattle Genetics (corporate member); Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (corporate member); St. Baldrick's Foundation; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (corporate member); Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Inc.; Takeda Oncology; Telomere Diagnostics, Inc.; University of Minnesota; and Wellpoint, Inc. (corporate member).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Cancer Society
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without complete remission (CR) or in first relapse (Rel1) can have extended leukemia control and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For patients in Rel1 or primary induction failure (PIF), transplantation versus treatment to achieve a second CR (CR2) and subsequent HCT might yield similar outcomes, but available comparative data are scarce. METHODS: Survival was analyzed in 4682 HCT recipients according to disease status: PIF (N = 1440), Rel1 (failing ≥1 reinduction; N = 1256), and CR2 (N = 1986). RESULTS: Patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were similar, except that patients in CR2 more often had performance scores of 90% to 100%, de novo AML, and longer CR1 duration. Adverse cytogenetics were more common in patients who experienced PIF. The 5-year survival rate adjusted for performance score, cytogenetic risk, and donor type for CR2 was 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) compared with 18% (95% CI, 16%-20%) for HCT in Rel1 and 21% (95% CI, 19%-23%) in PIF (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although survival is superior for patients who undergo HCT in CR2, transplantation for selected patients in Rel1 or PIF may still be valuable. These data can guide decision making about additional salvage therapy versus prompt HCT for patients not in CR, but they also highlight that AML is intrinsically more treatable in patients who have favorable-risk cytogenetics, those with longer CR1 duration, and younger patients with better performance status. Cancer 2017;123:2025–2034.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without complete remission (CR) or in first relapse (Rel1) can have extended leukemia control and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For patients in Rel1 or primary induction failure (PIF), transplantation versus treatment to achieve a second CR (CR2) and subsequent HCT might yield similar outcomes, but available comparative data are scarce. METHODS: Survival was analyzed in 4682 HCT recipients according to disease status: PIF (N = 1440), Rel1 (failing ≥1 reinduction; N = 1256), and CR2 (N = 1986). RESULTS: Patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were similar, except that patients in CR2 more often had performance scores of 90% to 100%, de novo AML, and longer CR1 duration. Adverse cytogenetics were more common in patients who experienced PIF. The 5-year survival rate adjusted for performance score, cytogenetic risk, and donor type for CR2 was 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) compared with 18% (95% CI, 16%-20%) for HCT in Rel1 and 21% (95% CI, 19%-23%) in PIF (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although survival is superior for patients who undergo HCT in CR2, transplantation for selected patients in Rel1 or PIF may still be valuable. These data can guide decision making about additional salvage therapy versus prompt HCT for patients not in CR, but they also highlight that AML is intrinsically more treatable in patients who have favorable-risk cytogenetics, those with longer CR1 duration, and younger patients with better performance status. Cancer 2017;123:2025–2034.
KW - acute myeloid leukemia
KW - allogeneic transplantation
KW - complete remission
KW - primary induction failure
KW - relapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019595123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.30536
DO - 10.1002/cncr.30536
M3 - Article
C2 - 28117884
AN - SCOPUS:85019595123
VL - 123
SP - 2025
EP - 2034
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
SN - 0008-543X
IS - 11
ER -