Allegiance Bias and Therapist Effects: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Binge Eating Disorder

G. Terence Wilson, Denise E. Wilfley, W. Stewart Agras, Susan W. Bryson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

"Allegiance bias" has been hypothesized to compromise the findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In contrast, our multisite RCT involving the collaboration of investigators with different allegiances regarding interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), guided self-help cognitive behavior therapy (CBTgsh), and behavioral weight loss therapy (BWL) for binge eating disorder showed no evidence of any differential site×treatment effects. The findings indicate that "allegiance bias" does not necessarily occur in well-controlled RCTs with appropriate therapist training. We also examined the role of individual therapist differences that have been alleged to be more important than treatment effects. No individual therapist effects emerged on any measure in either IPT or CBTgsh, both of which were significantly more effective than BWL at two-year follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-125
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Keywords

  • Allegiance bias
  • Binge eating disorder
  • Interpersonal psychotherapy
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Therapist effects

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Allegiance Bias and Therapist Effects: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Binge Eating Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this