Abstract
The random-zero sphygmomanometer has been widely used in observational studies and clinical trials for blood pressure measurement. We examined the agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers among 2007 Chinese study participants aged 15 to 60 years. Three blood pressure readings were obtained by trained observers using random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers, respectively, in a random order. Overall, blood pressure readings obtained using the random-zero device were significantly lower than those obtained with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer, with a mean difference ranging from-3.0 to-2.7 mm Hg for systolic and-1.4 to-0.9 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (all P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between mean blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers were high (0.90 for systolic and 0.85 for diastolic blood pressure, both P < 0.0001). In conclusion, our study indicated that there was strong agreement between blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers although blood pressure values were on average lower with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 373-378 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | American Journal of the Medical Sciences |
Volume | 336 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2008 |
Keywords
- Agreement
- Blood pressure measurements
- Random-zero sphygmomanometer
- Standard mercury sphygmomanometer