Abstract
Past research has frequently failed to find age differences in prospective memory. This article tested the possibility that age differences would be more likely to emerge on a prospective memory task that was high in self-initiated retrieval. In the 1st experiment, participants were asked to perform an action every 10 min (a time-based task presumed to be high in self-initiated retrieval); in the 2nd experiment, participants were asked to perform an action whenever a particular word was presented (an event-based task presumed to be relatively low in self-initiated retrieval). Age differences were found with the time-based task but not with the event-based task. This pattern of age differences was again found in a 3rd experiment in which a new experimental procedure was used and the nature of the prospective memory task was directly varied. Generally, the results suggest that self-initiated retrieval processes are an important component of age-related differences across both retrospective and prospective memory tasks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 996-1007 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Aging and Prospective Memory: Examining the Influences of Self-Initiated Retrieval Processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver